No Obligation to Deobligate Saves Money and Provides Certainty
With word recently that Congress passed legislative language in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reauthorization bill that amends the FEMA Stafford Act, one could almost hear the collective sigh coming from local governments in disaster-prone regions throughout the country.
November 05, 2018 at 10:45 AM
4 minute read
With word recently that Congress passed legislative language in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reauthorization bill that amends the FEMA Stafford Act, one could almost hear the collective sigh coming from local governments in disaster-prone regions throughout the country.
Over the last decade in Florida alone, numerous counties and local governments have been forced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to “clawback” or “deobligate” funds for repairs and debris removal that FEMA dispensed during the 2004-2005 hurricane season that saw Hurricanes Katrina, Francis and Charlie ravage much of the state.
FEMA's capriciousness about demanding its money back long after the fact has long been bitterly contested at the local level.
For example, from 2005, Collier County had funds from Hurricane Wilma obligated, deobligated, and then reobligated over a 12-year period. Collier County is just now reaching an agreement with the Florida Department of Emergency Management (FDEM) to obtain several million dollars in reimbursement for expenditures that FEMA previously reobligated after a lengthy and costly appeal.
Another example: after the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons, the city of Hialeah was awarded millions of dollars from FEMA to assist in its recovery. Years later, after the funds were spent, FEMA requested these funds to be paid back.
A local government's lengthy appeals to FEMA often outlive the original participants, which makes the process drawn out and more costly to both entities.
The uncertainty that was built into the original process hampered budget planning and fund distribution.
Additionally, many in local government were outraged that FEMA could deobligate previously awarded disaster funds for projects that have been certified complete by the state.
This new legislation amends the FEMA Stafford Act to prohibit any administrative action by FEMA to recover payments made to a state or local government for disaster or emergency assistance, except for fraud, after three years following the final report for a completed project.
The new law applies to any payment provided by FEMA on or after Jan. 1, 2004. It would also stop any action by FEMA to recover payment that is pending on the date of enactment of the bill.
The new legislation also limits the ability for the Homeland Security Inspector General's office to conduct audits to three years after the project completion.
Prior, the accounting, maintaining relevant documentation and procurement were a headache for over a decade, and local governments had to be prepared for a potential audit at all times. Audit delay and litigation left Florida's counties and cities responsible for surprise payments and last-minute budget confusion.
Finally, Congress has sent to the president's desk a way to stop future FEMA “clawbacks” of long-since approved and expended funds for hurricane recovery efforts, and to prevent lengthy and expensive reobligation appeals that place a significant strain on local government operational funds.
For Hialeah, this new legislation prevents FEMA from deobligating these funds, saving Hialeah and the taxpayers over $2.6 million and maximizing their financial recovery.
The new law will ensure that the process will be more objective, allowing FEMA enough time to review their payments and discover fraud or other improprieties while allowing for increased financial certainty that will help Florida's communities recover more quickly from future hurricanes and other disasters.
Although it took almost four years to pass, the result and certitude will be worth it. The bipartisan effort that went into passing this legislation is also noteworthy. Reps. Lois Frankel, Mario Diaz-Balart and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Sens. Bill Nelson and Marco Rubio and the rest of the Florida Congressional Delegation worked together to realize this achievement.
Omar Franco is a lobbyist at Becker and the managing director of the firm's Washington, D.C., office, where his clients include several Florida municipalities and counties.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 2Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 3State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 4Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 5Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250