Stryker Reaches Settlement in Nationwide Hip Replacement Lawsuits
A multistate team of litigators helped to negotiate a settlement with medical technology firm Stryker Corp. on Friday. Stryker, a Fortune 500 company, had been faced with multidistrict as well as multicounty litigation over damages caused by recalled hip replacement devices.
November 06, 2018 at 03:51 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys from Florida, New York, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts and Minnesota collaborated to secure a settlement in lawsuits involving defective hip replacement devices manufactured by Kalamazoo, Michigan-based medical technology company Stryker.
The multistate legal team guided the settlement with Stryker for damages caused by the recalled LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 Femoral Head. Their work helped resolve multidistrict litigation in Massachusetts and New Jersey.
According to the federal complaint filed in the District of Massachusetts, the devices used cobalt and titanium, described as “dissimilar metals.” Constant wear and tear between the two materials caused fretting and corrosion, producing “the release of toxic metal particles into the surrounding tissues of the hip” and bodily injury in its users, according to court documents.
“We started seeing our first cases maybe six, seven years ago,” said Joe Osborne, founder of Osborne & Francis Law Firm and a specialist in mass torts involving medical devices and pharmaceuticals. Osborne said he was asked to join the executive committee overseeing lawsuits over the faulty hip device due to his prior experience litigating against the defendant.
“I was on the steering committee for the Stryker Rejuvenate litigation and we had hundreds of cases against them,” he said. That 2014 litigation involved similar allegations over Stryker's Rejuvenate modular-neck device, and resulted in the international medical device manufacturer compensating thousands of plaintiffs more than $1 billion.
Several of the attorneys involved in the Rejuvenate settlement also helped bring the LFIT V40-related lawsuits. In addition to Osborne, Peter J. Flowers of Chicago law firm Meyers & Flowers, Michael L. McGlamry of Georgia-based Pope McGlamry Kilpatrick Morrison & Norwood, and Ashleigh Raso of Meshbesher & Spence in Minnesota had all represented clients in prior suits against Stryker.
Joining them the most recent round of litigation against Stryker were: Massachusetts attorney Walter Kelley of Bernheim Dolinsky Kelley; Brenda S. Fulmer and C. Calvin Warriner III of West Palm Beach-based Searcy Denney Scarola; Pope McGlamry litigator M.J. Blakely; and Ellen Relkin with Weitz & Luxenberg's New York office.
Although Osborne said the confidential settlement prevented him from disclosing the number of complaints consolidated in the multidistrict litigation, he said the settlement applies to “hundreds and hundreds” of cases filed across the U.S.
Osborne and the executive committee filed a petition with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate all LFIT V40 lawsuits against Stryker in the District of Massachusetts in April 2017. After the request had been granted, complaints filed in state court suits were consolidated as multicounty litigation in New Jersey Superior Court in Bergen County the following month, in May 2017.
A representative from Nutter McClennen & Fish, the Boston law firm retained by Stryker in the District of Massachusetts, declined to comment. The company's media relations did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Product liability attorneys Kim Catullo and Nora Wolf with Gibbons, who represented Stryker in New Jersey Superior Court, did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250