The Southeast Is Top of Mind for Law Firm Expansion
Pennsylvania-based law firms are mulling expansion in the South, but they may have trouble finding the right match.
November 06, 2018 at 08:13 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
As Fox Rothschild fills in another section of the East Coast with its latest merger, other large firms based in Pennsylvania are also thinking about the Southeast. But finding a match can be a major challenge.
Philadelphia-based Fox Rothschild finalized its biggest acquisition ever last week when the Am Law 100 firm gained about 125 lawyers in the Carolinas and Georgia from Smith Moore Leatherwood, and the firm is expanding in South Florida.
Fox Chairman Mark Silow said the latest deal has already resulted in new work, now that clients know the firm has an office in North Carolina, which had long been a geographic area of interest for the firm.
Consultant Tom Clay of Altman Weil said he knows at least a couple of Pennsylvania firms are looking to grow in Atlanta, but “there aren't that many firms in Atlanta of chewable bite size anymore.” Likewise, he said, the Carolinas and Nashville remain interesting markets to large firms.
Pennsylvania-born firms that already have a Southeastern presence include K&L Gates, Dechert, Duane Morris, Cozen O'Connor, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney and Ballard Spahr.
Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr and Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin both have multiple offices in Florida but not elsewhere in the Southeast.
Michael Heller, CEO of Cozen O'Connor, said his firm's Charlotte, North Carolina, office is smaller than he would like it to be. The firm has pursued opportunities in Atlanta and just opened an office in Richmond, Virginia. Additionally, he noted Cozen O'Connor is always seeking to grow in Miami.
“I think there are lots of opportunities in the Southeast, but we're not targeting any cities where we don't already have locations,” he said.
Law firms based in the Southeast also have been consolidating with one another, like Alabama-based Burr & Forman's recently announced combination with South Carolina's McNair Law Firm. And South Carolina-based Nelson Mullins expanded its reach in Florida this year by acquiring Miami's Broad and Cassel.
Law firms in the Carolinas and Georgia have been hot targets for years.
According to data from Altman Weil MergerLine, which tracks law firm combinations, 24 law firms based in North Carolina or South Carolina and 14 based in Georgia were acquired from 2007 to 2016.
Those deals included some hefty mergers by Am Law 200 firms. K&L Gates and McGuireWoods both acquired North Carolina firms of well over 100 lawyers in 2008, and Williams Mullen acquired a midsize firm in North Carolina the year before.
In Georgia, Dentons and Eversheds Sutherland made major acquisitions in 2015 and 2016 as well as Bryan Cave in 2008.
G. Mark Thompson, CEO of Marshall Dennehey, said Atlanta is a top city of interest for the firm, while Charlotte is also on its radar. But the firm isn't actively looking for a merger partner in either city, he said, and has no imminent plans to do so. Although he has spoken with some firms and recruiters in the area, he said.
A lot of self-insureds and insurance companies have offices or headquarters in Atlanta, Thompson said, making it an attractive market for the large insurance defense firm. Additionally, he noted Atlanta and Charlotte are both easily accessible to Philadelphia by flight, making a Southeast expansion more practical than, say, a West Coast expansion.
Ballard Spahr chairman Mark Stewart said his firm entered the Atlanta market because of a specific practice rather than geography. But it might be a good place to add lawyers if the right opportunity arose, he said.
“We don't have designs on any other office in the Southeast, which is not to say we'd not be interested in adding resources in the Southeast,” Stewart said. “We've talked to some folks in the Southeast, we've talked to some firms in the Southeast, and it seems like a right place” to grow.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
4 minute readThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250