Broward Judge Orders Immediate Release of Voter Records in Rick Scott-Bill Nelson Race
The ruling follows a request for an emergency hearing by Gov. Rick Scott's senate campaign.
November 09, 2018 at 05:26 PM
4 minute read
A Broward circuit judge ruled Friday that Broward Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes must release voter records requested by Gov. Rick Scott's campaign for the U.S. Senate by 7 p.m.
In an emergency hearing, Judge Carol-Lisa Phillips ruled Snipes violated Florida's Public Records Act by not responding to the Scott campaign's requests for ballot information in a reasonable amount of time.
“This court finds, once again, that Broward County is under the microscope and being viewed by the entire nation,” Phillips said during the hearing, referencing prior electoral controversies in the county. ”This court finds that there has been a violation of the Florida Constitution. Supervisor Snipes shall allow for the immediate inspection of the requested records.”
The judge noted the information in question “should have already been compiled” by the time of the court hearing.
Phillips' ruling follows complaints filed by Scott's campaign against the supervisors of election in Palm Beach and Broward counties. The complaints alleged both Snipes and Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher violated state law by not immediately replying to the campaign's records requests.
Arguing on behalf of Scott's campaign, GrayRobinson partner Jason Zimmerman told Phillips that his client's request was “very narrow.”
“This is not a drop-everything type of public records request. … This should take 10 minutes to do,” Zimmerman said. “We wanted documents very specifically tailored to not interfere with [Snipes'] duty to count these votes.”
Zimmerman repeatedly maintained this was “not a partisan issue.” His position was not shared by Eugene Pettis, the lawyer representing Snipes. The Haliczer Pettis & Schwamm partner told Phillips that the Scott campaign was trying to speed up the vote-counting process, a maneuver he described as “inappropriate.”
“You don't intervene and get in the counting process,” Pettis said. The Fort Lauderdale attorney argued Snipes' nonreply didn't indicate a records violationg and noted she and her staff were still occupied compiling the very information requested by the Scott campaign.
“Dr. Snipes has never told them she would not provide the information. … She's going to fulfill her duties and her responsibilities in a reasonable time. But,jJudge, we must give reasonable time,” the attorney said, noting the Scott request was filed only 26 hours after the polls closed.
Pettis' sentiments were echoed in court by Berger Singerman partner Leonard Samuels. Speaking on behalf of the Florida Democratic Party, Samuels — who also argued on behalf of the party in Broward Circuit Court during the upheaval after the 2000 presidential election — disputed Zimmerman's claim that their request would not require Snipes to drop everything.
“It simply would be unprecedented. There cannot be a worse time to order a 24-hour, drop-everything request,” he said.
Phillips' order to release the voter records cited the Fourth District Court of Appeal's July ruling on surveillance footage taken on the day of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February.
“When in doubt, the court should find in favor of disclosure rather than secrecy,” Phillips said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250