Florida AG Pam Bondi Criticizes State Officials Over Voting Recount
On Sunday, Bondi published letters sent to Florida Department of Law Enforcement Commissioner Rick Swearingen and Secretary of State Ken Detzner, chastizing them for not investigating purported voting problems in Broward and Palm Beach counties.
November 12, 2018 at 12:22 PM
4 minute read
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi has entered the fray in the latest election controversy to rock South Florida.
Following in the footsteps of fellow Republican Gov. Rick Scott, Bondi has chastised Florida officials concerning what she refers to as “irregularities” in Broward and Palm Beach Counties during the 2018 midterm elections.
On Sunday the Attorney General's Office shared letters sent by Bondi to Ken Detzner, the Secretary of State of Florida, as well as Florida Department of Law Enforcement Commissioner Rick Swearingen.
In her letters, Bondi implores both men to pursue alleged misconduct surrounding voting in the two populous South Florida counties.
Read Bondi's letter to Detzner:
“As part of your statutory duty as secretary of state, I know you and your staff are continuing to investigate the recent events occurring in Broward and Palm Beach Counties regarding the 2018 election,” Bondi wrote to Detzner. “In doing so, when you find any indication creating a reasonable suspicion of potential criminal activity, please report it to law enforcement agencies including the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.”
Bondi requests that Detzner “report any reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to both the statewide prosecutor and state attorney.”
The attorney general reserved far harsher language for Swearingen. On Friday it was reported that the FDLE had not opened an investigation on voter fraud as Scott had not submitted a request for such an inquiry in writing and “no allegation of voter fraud in Broward has been sent to the Florida Department of State, which oversees elections” according to the Miami Herald.
In her letter to Swearingen, Bondi said she was “deeply troubled” by the lack of an investigation.
“As law enforcement officials, regardless of political affiliation, it is our job to investigate facts and circumstances giving rise to reasonable suspicion in order to determine whether criminal conduct has occurred,” she wrote. “In the case of the 2018 election … election officials in Broward and Palm Beach Counties have been found by courts and have admitted in their own public statements, that irregularities occurred and required procedures were violated.”
Read Bondi's letter to Swearingen:
“It appears your unwillingness to investigate is based on your claim that the Florida Department of State has not, as of yet, identified criminal allegations of fraud,” Bondi continued. Asserting that Swearingen's “duty is not limited to investigating allegations made by the secretary of state” lists reports that supervisors of elections offices were “willfully and illegally counting ballots that were rejected by the canvassing board” as well as “supervisor of election staff and employees refusing to supply vote by mail ballots when requested” as enough grounds for an investigation to be opened.
“It is troubling your agency stated that a complaint by a candidate, government official or elections officer was not put in writing and therefore the failure to reduce a request to writing is a legitimate reason for refusing to investigate,” she added. “I fail to see how the Florida Department of Law Enforcement can legitimately refuse to investigate where there is reasonable suspicion that may lead to the discovery of criminal actions in the conduct of the 2018 election actions that gravely damage Floridians' confidence in our electoral process and our democracy.”
Requests for comment from the FDLE and and Florida Department of State were not answered by press time. The Attorney General's Office also did not respond to requests for comment.
On Friday Broward Circuit Judge Carol-Lisa Phillips and Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Krista Marx both entered favorable rulings to Scott's senate campaign in lawsuits against Broward Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes in addition to Susan Bucher, the supervisor of elections for West Palm Beach.
On Sunday the campaign filed three additional suits against the election supervisors.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 2The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 3November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 4Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
- 5How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250