This Law Group is Providing a 'Playbook for Resistance in the Time of Trump'
Our Fund Foundation, a South Florida philanthropy group, partnered with Lambda Legal for the eighth annual Fall LGBTQ Leadership Forum in Fort Lauderdale Monday night. Panelists discussed the rise of hard-right judicial appointees to the federal bench, and securing legal victories for queer clients in a time of immense uncertainty.
November 13, 2018 at 03:33 PM
5 minute read
Top LGBTQ attorneys are speaking out on how the Trump administration has forced them to rethink where they file complaints and how they engage with the justice system.
On Monday, roughly 200 litigators and advocates representing lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities gathered at the NSU Art Museum's Horvitz Auditorium in Fort Lauderdale for the eighth annual Fall LGBTQ Leadership Forum. The panel was hosted by South Florida-based and LGBTQ-oriented philanthropy group, Our Fund Foundation, in partnership with Lambda Legal, the oldest LGBTQ legal advocacy group in the United States.
The discussion, led by Lambda Legal's chief strategy officer and legal director Sharon McGowan, centered around the civil rights organization's strategy for achieving legal victories during — as the forum referred to it — “The Time of Trump.”
Two years into President Donald Trump's tenure, many of the federal agencies that sought to protect LGBTQ citizens from discrimination under the Obama administration have pulled back from their roles. Instead, the transgender military ban announced in March and the recently leaked Department of Health and Human Services memo on gender identity seem to illustrate that some agencies have lurched hostility toward individuals identifying as queer or homosexual.
“The federal government, a place where students turned to seek assistance, is sort of closed for business,” said Paul Castillo, Lambda Legal's senior attorney for the association's eight-state South Central Regional Office.
McGowan agreed.
“I think that the progress we experienced during the last administration created an expectation where people thought and came of age thinking the federal government had an obligation to protect them,” she said. “What we are experiencing now is a withdrawal of that protection and an abdication of that responsibility.”
McGowan and her fellow panelists said this shift has resulted in a reorientation of priorities for the organization and other LGBTQ groups. Rather than trying to secure protections and favorable verdicts on the federal level, social justice litigators have instead refocused on trial courts and in “being strategic about where we bring cases.”
“Sometimes we turn to state courts when federal courts become hostile or claims become more difficult to win,” she said, attributing these localized legal gains to states whose constitutional provisions “have more robust protections for equality and liberty.”
“We use that to build the garden … that will turn to progress on the federal level when we have more hospitable environments in which to work,” she continued. “Not as sexy as the big wins, but it's a really important part of preserving the playing field to make sure we have the ability to continue to make progress going forward.”
Ethan Rice, a former child welfare attorney who serves as Lambda's Fair Courts Project attorney, said many recent of the LGBTQ community's recent legal gains have come from efforts to inform judges, prosecutors and larger legal groups about the realities of discrimination against queer people in the U.S.
“I've seen such an amazing change in the last three or four years,” he said. According to Rice, most judges and prosecutor in the past would not have raised their hands when asked if they'd worked with LGBT groups. But things have changed.
“Now at least half of people raise their hand when asked about working with LGBT youth,” Rice said, adding that a multiyear push to educate the court system has been “a successful project.”
“Trial level judges are interacting with our community the most,” Rice added, noting that trial judges are likely to ascend to the appellate bench down the line. “I'm hoping that by talking to judges at the trial level — as they are going to be hearing Lambda Legal cases perhaps later on in their career — they've had this education about LGBT issues.”
Speaking on Lambda Legal's July 2018 victory in their lawsuit against a Jacksonville school board for discriminating against transgender teen Drew Adams, the panelists affirmed the importance of humanizing their clients by sharing their stories. McGowan said she knew the organization's legal team “moved the needle” when hearing the judge presiding over Adams' case deliver his ruling.
“You can hear the voice of the judge talking about this young man and this judge was changed,” she said. “He now knows something that he did not know before, and he knew it because [Castillo] and all the amazing lawyers from Lambda and our co-counsel … shared that story and changed it from an abstract legal issue into a story about this young man and his ability to go to school.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1How a C-Section 'Scheduling Error' Led to a $17M Settlement
- 2Judge Louis C. Bechtle: An American Jurist Who Relied on Common Sense, Sound Judgment and Fairness
- 3Send Us Your New Partners for the NJ Law Journal's New Partners Yearbook
- 4Six Ways Thought Leadership Can Support Your Law Firm’s 2025 Strategic Plan
- 5'Unlawful' and 'Unconstitutional?:' Trump Lawyers Aim for Wholesale Dismissal of Manhattan Criminal Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250