Your Professionalism Has Just Been Questioned on Social Media. What Can You Do?
Your law practice generates clients and referrals on social media. Other attorneys speak highly of you on LinkedIn, and you rate a perfect five stars on Avvo.
November 14, 2018 at 09:37 AM
5 minute read
Your law practice generates clients and referrals on social media. Other attorneys speak highly of you on LinkedIn, and you rate a perfect five stars on Avvo.
And then someone writes a negative review. Whether it's on Google or a similar directory, there's a stain on your reputation. What can you, as managing partner or firm administrator, do about it?
The good news is that you saw it as soon as it was posted. Constant monitoring of your law firm's reputation is essential to a healthy online presence. For most social media, including Google reviews, a daily check suffices.
On Twitter, where updates happen in a matter of seconds, you must log in several times a day. Some large practices have people devoted to watching the account every moment during business hours and on weekends because people on that platform are accustomed to instantaneous responses.
When you see a negative review, do not become emotional. Rage against the person who posted or fear that the negative comment will go viral are not productive feelings. Read and re-read the review until you understand it, research the complaint and develop a planned response.
Here's what you must do:
Answer right away. Post a note in 24 to 48 hours. When people go public with complaints, they want to be heard—and quick. Your note can be as short as: “Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We take every client matter seriously and will work to resolve yours with haste.” Even if you can't do that immediately, show that you care by acknowledging the review. That leads to the second point …
Offer to make it right. A proposed solution can take many forms, each of which depends on the client's situation. A positive gesture can go a long way toward defusing the reviewer's feelings of anger or disappointment. To do that …
Take the conversation private. Lift a page from the communications playbook of major brands and ask the reviewer to discuss the matter with you via a provided email or telephone number, or via private message. That elevates the seriousness of your response while taking it out of the limelight. It's easier to work out a problem when others cannot comment online or share the conversation through a repost.
When responding, be authentic and conversational. Avoid writing like an attorney or a marketer, such as “We serve all clients with the same high quality for which our firm has long been known.” Write the same way you would speak to the person on the phone or in person.
Don't argue. You might be innocent from a legal standpoint, but in the court of public opinion you will be found guilty of indifference or worse. Statements such as, “I am sorry that you don't understand how the law works,” are condescending.
Be succinct. Your law practice's difficulties are not someone else's problems. Thus, don't make excuses. No one cares whether a paralegal forgot to check the court docket. Admit being wrong without details that make you look incompetent, such as losing track of a document for a few days. Acknowledge that you didn't perform at your best and move on.
Take the high road. The post may be rude, crude and false. Do not respond in kind. Act in a professional, polite manner for the sake of your colleagues and everyone who clicks on the zero-star and one-star ratings. Express sympathy: “I am sorry that you were not happy with the outcome of your case.” The people reading your answer will see that you are not as bad as the review suggests. They may even think it's a fake review. If you do, too, you can …
Report suspicious posts, especially from someone you don't know. Google has a procedure for notifying it of a review that may be spam or designed to harm a business's reputation. So do Yelp and Avvo. Like you, they want honest critiques. However, they may decide that a post doesn't violate their terms and leave it up there, no matter how false the claim.
Is that it? No, you can do more even if you think that the reviewer is not worth the time, will be more combative when directly addressed, or might take a private conversation public with more disparaging remarks.
Turn the negative into a positive. The best outcome is that your legal practice not only makes the client happy, the person posts a follow-up review telling how pleased he or she is. That's one of the best posts because it shows that when your firm makes a mistake, it acknowledges and corrects it in such a way that the client says, “Wow!”
Most important is to have the proper online monitoring tools working for you. Google Alerts can be set up on the name of your firm and key attorneys as well as other social listening applications. Lexis Nexis is also effective. Make this a priority. Your reputation is your most important asset, and it must be protected.
Don Silver is COO of Boardroom Communications, a Florida PR and integrated marketing agency. He co-leads the firm's crisis communications and online reputation management practice group. Contact him at [email protected].
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Canadian Influx: How Migration to Florida Is Shaping the South Florida Real Estate Market
6 minute readReflections: Parenting Lessons From Life as a Sports Attorney
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250