Florida AG and Miami-Dade State Attorney File Dueling Motions in High Court Over 'Stand Your Ground' Amendment
The state attorney general's office Wednesday asked the Florida Supreme Court to deny an amicus brief filed by Katherine Fernandez Rundle, Miami's chief prosecutor.
November 15, 2018 at 04:05 PM
4 minute read
Left to right: Florida Solicitor General Amit Agarwal and Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle. Photo: J. Albert Diaz/ALM
Florida's foremost prosecutors are clashing in the state's supreme court over the constitutionality of a 2017 amendment to Florida's “Stand Your Ground” law.
On Wednesday, Florida Solicitor General Amit Agarwal filed a response to the Florida Supreme Court in opposition of an Oct. 26 amicus brief submitted by Katherine Fernandez Rundle in Tashara Love v. State of Florida. In her brief, Fernandez Rundle — who has served as the Miami-Dade State Attorney since being elected in 1993 — adopted the position of an earlier motion filed by the South Florida-based League of Prosecutors.
Both Fernandez Rundle and the organization called the newest iteration of the “stand your ground” law unconstitutional. Both parties take issue with the 2017 amendment placing the burden upon prosecutors to assert with “clear and convincing evidence” that a defendant's use of force was not justified or afforded protection under the “stand your ground” law.
Read Fernandez Rundle's brief:
“It is important for this court to recognize that [the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office] has not changed its basic position that the statute is unconstitutional,” the brief said, referencing its answer to the question “raised in various trial courts in Miami-Dade County.”
Fernandez Rundle's motion held the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office “supports the position of the League of Prosecutors and desires to adopt its brief as its own in an amicus capacity.”
Responding on behalf of Attorney General Pam Bondi's office, Agarwal's motion referred to the brief filed by Miami's chief prosecutor as “highly unusual” and “apparently unprecedented.”
Read Agarwal's response:
“The League's brief is already available to the court, as are other briefs discussing the constitutional separation-of-powers issue,” he wrote. “Rather, granting the State Attorney's motion to adopt a position that has already been discussed by other amici would serve no purpose other than to circumvent Florida law, which grants the Attorney General, not the State Attorney, the authority to speak for the state in its appellate courts.”
While the response recommends that the Florida Supreme Court grant the League of Prosecutors' motion to file an amicus brief, it asks the high court to “deny the State Attorney's separate motion to 'adopt' the League's position in the State Attorney's capacity as an amicus.”
Neither the League of Prosecutors nor the office of the Florida Attorney General responded to requests for comment by press time.
In a statement to the Daily Business Review, Fernandez Rundle said she disagrees with the arguments presented in Agarwal's filing.
“There is precedent in Smith v. State that speaks to the court's benefiting from full briefing when the constitutionality of a statute is in question, regardless of the positions of the agencies representing the parties before the court,” she said, reiterating her view “that the Florida Supreme Court should exercise its discretion and decide this issue.”
“I want to make sure that the court knows that I was the entity representing the State of Florida in the trial court, and I believe in and stand by my position in the trial court on this issue of great public importance,” she said.
The Florida Supreme Court's decision is also poised to determine whether the 2017 change concerning the burden of proof in “stand your ground” cases could be applied retroactively. The Third District Court of Appeal ruled in May that this could not be applied retroactively in plaintiff Tashara Love's underlying case. Love had previously sought to utilize the “stand your ground” defense while being prosecuted for a November 2015 shooting outside a Miami-Dade strip club.
Related stories:
Florida Shooting: Man Arrested in 'Stand Your Ground' Case
Split Court Rulings Continue on 'Stand Your Ground' Change
Florida Supreme Court to Take Up 'Stand Your Ground' Split
NRA Group to Weigh In on Case Testing Change to Florida's 'Stand Your Ground' Law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/18/1b/6bd668a742d2b7c52a213921ac7b/bucciero-gorwitz-cid-767x633.jpg)
Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
3 minute read![Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/5a/54f1609943889700618e7b8cd244/shaw-wilder-robinson-767x633.jpg)
![Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/e5/cb5a9afd423bb775415c5ba8a0e4/ronald-skloss-767x633.jpg)
Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner
3 minute read![Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2024/08/International-View.jpeg-image767x633cropped.jpg)
Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250