What's Next for Surfside After Developer Nixes Town Hall, Garage Project?
Facing resistance from the Town Commission and residents, a development team nixed its own plan for a new Surfside town hall, police station and garage.
November 15, 2018 at 11:08 AM
4 minute read
The plan for a new Surfside town hall, police station and garage has been scrapped after running into opposition from residents.
Pointe Development Co. and Monceau Realty Group, both based in Miami, wanted to jointly develop a $35 million Surfside Civic Center comprising a 17,705-square-foot, three-story town hall on the current site at 9293 Harding Ave., a 14,035-square-foot police station on a town-owned lot to the north at 269 93rd St. and a public garage with more than 400 spaces.
The unsolicited, public-private partnership plan called for the commission chamber to be on the first floor, administration on the second, and a gym and other amenities for residents on the third, said Maurice Egozi, co-founder and principal of Pointe Development. Retail and office space also were planned on the first floor.
The developers would have financed the construction and rented the town's land for 99 years for $250,000 annually and would have generated revenue from the stores, offices and parking, Egozi said.
But the developers pulled the proposal Nov. 8 after Town Commissioner Michael Karukin put an item on Tuesday's agenda calling for the town to nix negotiations on the proposal. The commission voted to end talks.
The project received a mixed reception from residents, some of whom questioned the deal and its impact on the affluent oceanfront town of 5,800.
“We don't need this development. This construction design in my opinion is an insult to Surfside's environment. Two huge glass buildings looking like Midtown office blocks are not in keeping” with the town's character, Pamela Salem-O'Hagan, who lives the project site, said at a meeting Sept. 26. That's when the commission voted 3-2 to evaluate the proposal.
“Any sort of glass would raise the temperature of the sidewalks,” she said. “They totally detract from the beach feel of Surfside, the reason most of us chose to live in this gem of a little town.”
Salem-O'Hagan also said the plan gave the developers prime beachfront property for nominal rent and there's no need for another gym as many condominiums have their own.
The developers balked after Karukin scheduled the vote.
“In the end, we didn't feel we would have had enough commission votes to move it forward,” Egozi said.
He noted a petition for the developers' plan received more than 450 signatures, and the companies were willing to take the plan to a referendum.
On Sept. 26, the commission voted 3-2 to start talks with the developers with Commissioners Karukin and Tina Paul dissenting. But by Tuesday, opponents had four votes on the five-member commission.
Mayor Daniel Dietch said he changed his mind because the developers didn't hold promised community meetings to discuss the project, and the proposal was “degrading the fabric of the community” by creating friction.
“The public meetings hosted by the developer did not occur, and I thought that that was a problem because if the proposal is not well understood it's very difficult to get public support,” Dietch said. “Over that time there was a lot of concern expressed by residents of our community. I took that to heart.”
Egozi said he and the rest of the development team submitted their proposal after meeting months ago with town officials, some of whom had said the town administration has outgrown its facilities.
Dietch, however, said the issue really is more about parking then town offices. The configuration of the building and walls that are difficult to tear down make it difficult to reconfigure offices, he said. The town will turn its attention to parking.
A 2013 study by Michigan-based Rich & Associates Inc. found the town has a parking deficit in downtown and along Collins Avenue where older condos are located, according to town records.
The town plans to assess the parking deficiency, identify areas where additional parking can be provided and explore other options like leasing private parking, Dietch said.
“The idea is to capture that information and share with the community before any decisions are made.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250