Judges Speak Out: Retiring Justices Don't Approve of Gov. Rick Scott's Rush to Replace Them
"I will not sit silently while the majority muddles — or disregards — our Constitution and related rules," wrote Florida Supreme Court Justice R. Fred Lewis, dissenting from a majority opinion the Judicial Nominating Commission's was correct to start the judicial application process before he and Justices Barbara Pariente and Peggy Quince retire on Jan. 8.
November 19, 2018 at 12:47 PM
3 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court denied petitions by national political groups League of Women Voters and Common Cause to restart the application process for three upcoming vacancies on its bench, ruling on Friday that the Judicial Nominating Commission was right to pick nominees before Jan. 8, when the spots officially open up.
But retiring justices R. Fred Lewis, Barbara Pariente and Peggy Quince had other ideas.
“The majority today has reached an unfounded result that ignores the plain and explicit language of the Florida Constitution that the voters have established as our sacred governing document,” Lewis wrote, dissenting from the majority opinion.
The dispute centered on two phrases in the Florida Constitution under article V, section 11.
One states that the governor shall appoint a replacement “whenever a judicial vacancy occurs,” while another asserts that the JNC shall nominate replacements ”within 30 days from the occurrence of a vacancy.”
Read the full court order:
The majority — Chief Justice Charles Canady and Justices Ricky Polston, Alan Lawson and Jorge Labarga — found for the JNC, which interprets that 30-day window as a deadline for making nominations. That way, the JNC could start the process before judges leave the bench and have them replaced before the 30 days are up.
“That is the most reasonable reading of the language and is consistent with this court's precedent analyzing similar language,” Canady wrote.
But the minority pushed back, arguing that the JNC can't act until there's an actual vacancy once a judge is gone. Its stance is in line with the petitioners', who wanted to extend the deadline for judicial applicants.
Related story: Liberal Groups Seek to Extend State Supreme Court Selections
Lewis accused the majority of ignoring “the will of the people” to forge its own path.
“I will not sit silently while the majority muddles—or disregards—our Constitution and related rules,” Lewis wrote.
Florida Gov. Rick Scott triggered the nomination process Oct. 15, hoping to select the three new justices himself. But the high court shut him down, ruling that Florida's next governor should make the decision.
Republican Ron DeSantis will be Florida's next governor, following a wafer-thin win and court-mandated recount. DeSantis will take the baton from fellow Republican Scott on Jan 8., the same day Lewis, Pariente and Quince retire, and he will select their replacements.
Quince said the court's decision was practical but not constitutional. She argued the earliest the JNC should start considering applicants is Dec. 8 — 30 days before the vacancies.
“If Governor Scott is unable to make the appointments, he is similarly unable to utilize the 30-day extension,” Quince wrote.
The JNC will meet in Orlando on Nov. 27 to select its final nominees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250