Administrative Judge Rejects State Contracts for HIV, AIDS Care
In an 80-page ruling, Judge John Newton said the Agency for Health Care Administration did not follow rules it included in an initial request for vendors in the Medicaid managed-care program.
November 21, 2018 at 04:03 PM
5 minute read
An administrative law judge recommended that the state Agency for Health Care Administration toss aside agreements it signed for treatment of Medicaid beneficiaries with HIV and AIDS in three South Florida counties.
In an 80-page ruling, Judge John Newton said the Agency for Health Care Administration did not follow rules it included in an initial request for vendors in the Medicaid managed-care program. As a result, Newton said the state should reject all responses submitted by managed-care plans for HIV and AIDS treatment in the counties and renew the contracting process.
The ruling came just weeks before Medicaid beneficiaries in South Florida are expected to transition from old managed-care plans to new plans that are a result of a lengthy contracting process. The Agency for Health Care Administration had hoped to finalize the transition by Dec. 1, according to its website.
Agency spokeswoman Mallory McManus told the News Service of Florida that the state was reviewing the judge's recommended order and had no further comment. Under administrative law, the recommended order has to go back to the agency for final action.
The ruling was a victory for the AIDS Health Care Foundation and its managed-care subsidiary, Positive Healthcare, and a loss for Simply Healthcare Plans, which was picked by the agency to provide the care for HIV and AIDS patients.
“We applaud Judge Newton for making a decision that is not just a decision that is right for AIDS Healthcare Foundation and Positive Healthcare but a decision that is right and has a positive impact on the thousands of HIV patients that rely on this care,” AIDS Healthcare Foundation official Imara Canady told The News Service of Florida.
Canady said the health plan has been in communications with its patients throughout the legal challenge. He said there had been some “murmurs” in the community that the health plan was dissolving.
Canady said the foundation is going to “make sure patients are clear we are very much here.”
Florida lawmakers in 2011 required that almost all Medicaid beneficiaries enroll in managed-care plans, with contracts divvied up in 11 regions of the state. An initial set of contracts is expiring, which led the Agency for Health Care Administration to go through a procurement process that ended in awarding the HIV and AIDS contracts to Simply Healthcare in two regions made up of Broward, Miami-Dade and Monroe counties.
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation challenged the contract awards in administrative court, with the state unsuccessfully trying to get the cases dismissed. The state argued that Positive Healthcare violated what is known as a “cone of silence,” which precludes vendors from making contact during certain time frames with anyone in government regarding bids.
AHCA alleged, in part, that Positive Healthcare violated the cone of silence by sending letters to the governor's office criticizing the agency's decisions. AHCA said during a hearing that if it were ordered to reissue the contracts, it wouldn't award them to Positive Healthcare because of the alleged violation.
But Newton said the agency didn't initially reject the AIDS Healthcare Foundation bid because of the alleged cone of silence violations.
The Agency for Health Care Administration's contracting process included seeking health plans to provide long-term care and “managed medical assistance,” the types of care needed by the bulk of Medicaid beneficiaries. It also sought “specialty plans,” which deal with specific populations such as patients with HIV and AIDs.
While the AIDS Healthcare Foundation challenge may have gotten the most public attention, Newton also considered challenges filed by Community Care Plan, a type of managed-care plan known as a “provider sponsored network” that is owned by two Broward County hospital districts.
In addition to submitting a bid to provide managed medical assistance in Broward County, Community Care Plan submitted bids to provide care to people with serious mental illness, children with special health care needs, children in the child welfare program and people living with HIV and AIDS.
While AHCA chose Community Care Plan as a managed medical-assistance provider for Broward County it didn't invite the health plan to negotiations for specialty-plan contracts.
Community Care Plan filed a challenge to the agency's decision to award a Broward contract for people with serious mental illness to a subsidiary of WellCare of Florida. It also challenged an agency decision to deny Community Care Plan contracts for other types of special plans.
Along with recommending that the agency reject all responses submitted by managed-care plans for HIV and AIDS treatment, Newton recommended that it should invite Community Care Plan to negotiate to provide care in Broward for patients with serious mental illness and for child-welfare specialty services. He also recommended that the agency award a contract to the WellCare subsidiary, Staywell Health Plan of Florida, to provide services for patients with serious mental illness.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250