Fort Lauderdale Sues Big Pharma Over 'Staggering' Opioid Deaths
Lawyers for Fort Lauderdale filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on Tuesday, blaming pharmaceutical companies for the "staggering, unanticipated, and far-reaching effects" of local opioid abuse, and accusing them of conspiring to hike prices.
November 21, 2018 at 03:56 PM
4 minute read
Lawyers from four South Florida firms for the city of Fort Lauderdale filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against dozens of pharmaceutical companies, alleging their corporate greed contributed to skyrocketing opioid-related deaths in the city.
Attorneys from Miami, Boca Raton, Jacksonville and Fort Lauderdale are handling the case from Haliczer, Pettis & Schwamm; Morgan & Morgan; Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd; and Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert.
Broward County averaged more than 10 opioid overdose deaths a week in 2016, according to the complaint, which puts Fort Lauderdale on the forefront of “the worst man-made epidemic in modern medical history,” thanks to the abuse and overprescription of opioids.
In response, the city has poured funds into public services such as police, overdose reversal medication and addiction treatment programs, emergency response systems and foster care— money it wants back.
“Fort Lauderdale has unexpectedly had to spend vast funds on a wide range of services to fight the opioid epidemic's staggering, unanticipated, and far-reaching effects,” the complaint said.
The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of Florida, points the finger at a string of companies, including Walgreen Co., Purdue Pharma L.P. and Johnson & Johnson, and details two alleged schemes ran by drug marketers and distributors that made “blockbuster profits.” One was designed to misrepresent risks and increase demand for opioids and the other failed to catch suspicious orders, according to the complaint.
Fort Lauderdale also accused the defendants of conspiring to inflate prices and exploit vulnerable populations.
Johnson & Johnson's pharmaceutical company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, said its actions were appropriate and responsible, and claimed its opioid medications account for less than 1 percent of the U.S. market.
“The labels for our prescription opioid pain medicines provide information about their risks and benefits, and the allegations made against our company are baseless and unsubstantiated,” said spokesperson Andrew Wheatley. “Opioid abuse and addiction are serious public health issues. We are committed to being part of the ongoing dialogue and to doing our part to find ways to address this crisis.”
Walgreen declined to comment on the case, and Purdue Pharma did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Read the full complaint:
|
Meet the lawyers
Fort Lauderdale has seven Florida lawyers on the case.
Debra P. Klauber oversees trials and appeals at Haliczer Pettis in Fort Lauderdale, while the firm's co-founder Eugene K. Pettis handles a range of complex corporate, public sector and individual civil cases.
James D. Young of Morgan & Morgan in Jacksonville specializes in complex litigation and has served as special counsel to three Florida attorneys general.
Mark J. Dearman of Robbins Geller's Boca Raton office specializes in mass torts, fraud, whistleblower and corporate takeover litigation. Managing partner Paul J. Geller has served in a variety of government cases over the opioid crisis, and has argued for corporations and consumers in class action lawsuits across the country.
Scott Weiselberg handles commercial and real estate litigation at Kopelowitz Ostrow in Fort Lauderdale, while Robert C. Gilbert of the firm's Miami office specializes in complex business cases and class actions nationwide.
The lawyers declined to discuss the case, deferring to a Fort Lauderdale representative Chaz Adams, who said the complaint speaks for itself.
The defendants have not yet assigned counsel to the case, and it's unclear whether they've been served yet.
U.S. District Judge William P. Dimitrouleas in the Southern District of Florida will oversee the case. Fort Lauderdale seeks punitive damages, plus interest, attorney fees and costs.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readFreeman Mathis & Gary Taps Orlando for Third New Florida Office This Year
3 minute readFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1Miami Beach Hotel Sues Celebrity Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, Asserts It Won’t Be ‘Extorted'
- 2'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
- 3California Supreme Court to Weigh Reach of Peremptory Challenge Law
- 4Court Rules Thumbs-Up Emoji Can Constitute a Contract Agreement
- 5Delaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250