Fort Lauderdale Sues Big Pharma Over 'Staggering' Opioid Deaths
Lawyers for Fort Lauderdale filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on Tuesday, blaming pharmaceutical companies for the "staggering, unanticipated, and far-reaching effects" of local opioid abuse, and accusing them of conspiring to hike prices.
November 21, 2018 at 03:56 PM
4 minute read
Lawyers from four South Florida firms for the city of Fort Lauderdale filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against dozens of pharmaceutical companies, alleging their corporate greed contributed to skyrocketing opioid-related deaths in the city.
Attorneys from Miami, Boca Raton, Jacksonville and Fort Lauderdale are handling the case from Haliczer, Pettis & Schwamm; Morgan & Morgan; Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd; and Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert.
Broward County averaged more than 10 opioid overdose deaths a week in 2016, according to the complaint, which puts Fort Lauderdale on the forefront of “the worst man-made epidemic in modern medical history,” thanks to the abuse and overprescription of opioids.
In response, the city has poured funds into public services such as police, overdose reversal medication and addiction treatment programs, emergency response systems and foster care— money it wants back.
“Fort Lauderdale has unexpectedly had to spend vast funds on a wide range of services to fight the opioid epidemic's staggering, unanticipated, and far-reaching effects,” the complaint said.
The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of Florida, points the finger at a string of companies, including Walgreen Co., Purdue Pharma L.P. and Johnson & Johnson, and details two alleged schemes ran by drug marketers and distributors that made “blockbuster profits.” One was designed to misrepresent risks and increase demand for opioids and the other failed to catch suspicious orders, according to the complaint.
Fort Lauderdale also accused the defendants of conspiring to inflate prices and exploit vulnerable populations.
Johnson & Johnson's pharmaceutical company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, said its actions were appropriate and responsible, and claimed its opioid medications account for less than 1 percent of the U.S. market.
“The labels for our prescription opioid pain medicines provide information about their risks and benefits, and the allegations made against our company are baseless and unsubstantiated,” said spokesperson Andrew Wheatley. “Opioid abuse and addiction are serious public health issues. We are committed to being part of the ongoing dialogue and to doing our part to find ways to address this crisis.”
Walgreen declined to comment on the case, and Purdue Pharma did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Read the full complaint:
Meet the lawyers
Fort Lauderdale has seven Florida lawyers on the case.
Debra P. Klauber oversees trials and appeals at Haliczer Pettis in Fort Lauderdale, while the firm's co-founder Eugene K. Pettis handles a range of complex corporate, public sector and individual civil cases.
James D. Young of Morgan & Morgan in Jacksonville specializes in complex litigation and has served as special counsel to three Florida attorneys general.
Mark J. Dearman of Robbins Geller's Boca Raton office specializes in mass torts, fraud, whistleblower and corporate takeover litigation. Managing partner Paul J. Geller has served in a variety of government cases over the opioid crisis, and has argued for corporations and consumers in class action lawsuits across the country.
Scott Weiselberg handles commercial and real estate litigation at Kopelowitz Ostrow in Fort Lauderdale, while Robert C. Gilbert of the firm's Miami office specializes in complex business cases and class actions nationwide.
The lawyers declined to discuss the case, deferring to a Fort Lauderdale representative Chaz Adams, who said the complaint speaks for itself.
The defendants have not yet assigned counsel to the case, and it's unclear whether they've been served yet.
U.S. District Judge William P. Dimitrouleas in the Southern District of Florida will oversee the case. Fort Lauderdale seeks punitive damages, plus interest, attorney fees and costs.
Related stories:
In the Opioid Litigation, Who Represents Addicted Babies?
Judge Recommends Government Claims Against Opioid Makers Go Forward
South Florida and Chicago Law Firms Ally in Class Action Against Drug Manufacturers
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet
Amid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readFreeman Mathis & Gary Taps Orlando for Third New Florida Office This Year
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250