Senate President Galvano Signals Workers' Comp Could Be on Table
Galvano said the laws need to be looked at because of two state Supreme Court rulings, including one that eliminated caps on fees charged by attorneys who represent injured workers.
November 21, 2018 at 02:22 PM
4 minute read
New Senate President Bill Galvano is promising to revisit Florida's workers' compensation insurance laws, despite two decreases in rates for employers.
Galvano said the laws need to be looked at because of two state Supreme Court rulings, including one that eliminated caps on fees charged by attorneys who represent injured workers. He said there is a chance the rulings could result in rate hikes in the future.
“I don't want to be in a situation where they spike and then we are running to fix it at that point,” Galvano, R-Bradenton, told reporters Friday. “I'd rather look at the system and make any changes that are necessary while we have the luxury of not having high rates.”
Galvano, who formally took over as president Tuesday, would not say whether he would be willing to offer proposals that would affect employers and employees, saying that is “not a decision that has been made.”
His willingness to tackle workers' compensation insurance comes on the heels of an announcement this month by the state Office of Insurance Regulation that rates will go down an average of 13.8 percent in 2019. That follows a 9.5 percent average rate reduction this year.
While rates are being reduced, Bill Herrle, executive director of the National Federation of Independent Business in Florida, said that doesn't mean all problems are solved for employers who must buy the coverage.
“Dropping rates doesn't guarantee that all is well with workers' compensation. We're grateful that he sees that clearly,” Herrle said. “However, a good workers' compensation reform bill is always a heavy lift, no matter which direction rates are heading. Kudos to [Galvano].”
Workers' compensation insurance proposals are difficult to pass because of the various interest groups, including business groups, health-care providers who are paid to treat injured workers and plaintiffs attorneys who are sometimes hired to represent workers.
At a minimum, there is usually a divide between business groups and plaintiffs' attorneys, many of which are represented by the Florida Justice Association.
Business groups argue that attorneys' fees drive up costs in the workers' compensation system, while plaintiffs' lawyers contend they help ensure injured workers can get needed representation in disputes with insurers.
The Republican-dominated Legislature in 2003 passed a sweeping rewrite of the workers' compensation system that, among other things, tied the recovery of worker attorneys' fees to percentages of the amounts of recovered benefits. The law was tweaked in 2009 to make clear that workers' compensation judges were precluded from awarding additional hourly fees for plaintiffs' attorneys.
But in a 2016 ruling known as Castellanos v. Next Door, the Florida Supreme Court struck down the fee caps as unconstitutional.
Ryan Banfill, a spokesman for the Florida Justice Association, praised Galvano for agreeing to tackle workers' compensation insurance and listed a number of issues the association is interested in pursuing, including increased choice of medical providers for injured workers. Florida has a managed-care mandate for workers' compensation insurance, which limits the physicians who workers can see for treatment.
“Safe workplaces throughout Florida depend on state leaders like President Galvano to take a thorough, measured, and responsible examination of the workers' compensation insurance system,” Banfill said in a statement. “As someone who has fought to accomplish common-sense, comprehensive and constitutional reforms across his tenure in state government, Senator Galvano is in an excellent position to create meaningful and enduring changes that make the safety of Floridians a principle that is coequal to workable solutions to employers.”
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 2Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
- 3Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 4Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
- 5Ex-Schnader Partner Nears Settlement in Misappropriated Comp Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250