Defense Counsel Should Include Public Relations as Part of Their Strategy
Time was, if a local or national company was sued, news of the lawsuit—assuming it even made the news—was largely confined to the city or town where the suit was filed.
November 26, 2018 at 09:55 AM
4 minute read
Time was, if a local or national company was sued, news of the lawsuit—assuming it even made the news—was largely confined to the city or town where the suit was filed.
But the internet changed all that. Now, even frivolous suits can mar a company's reputation around the globe in a matter of hours. Social media can echo and amplify these effects many times over.
Indeed, social media attention to a case can even spark coverage by traditional media.
Plaintiffs lawyers, long mindful that publicity can be among the most potent weapons in convincing a defendant to settle a case, often use public relations to try a case in public well before it gets to a courtroom.
Cases are ultimately decided in the courtroom or at the settlement table. But judges, jurors and members of the public often decide how to view a case from media coverage. What's more, negative publicity can tarnish a defendant's reputation for years to come, regardless of the outcome of the case.
Which is why it's more important than ever for defense counsel to include public relations as part of their strategy; it's no longer enough to wait until the client is vindicated in court.
As someone who has helped both plaintiffs and defense lawyers with public relations strategies, I acknowledge that I benefit from this trend. But I believe defense attorneys may find themselves at a disadvantage by not including public relations as part of their legal strategies.
Plaintiffs may benefit by filing lawsuits at the same time that they reach out to the media—all that may take place before the defendant has even been served. As a result, defense attorneys and their clients can be unprepared when reporters call, or even knock on the door.
That being said, there are ways that the defense can mitigate negative media coverage from lawsuits.
Companies should always have a plan for managing crises such as natural disasters or sexual harassment claims. In the same spirit, businesses should be ready for lawsuits and the resulting negative publicity. Most companies will be sued; it's simply an unfortunate part of doing business.
Sometimes companies can see a lawsuit coming, other times, a suit may come out of the blue. Either way, having a plan in place can give a business a head start in responding.
Here are some PR tips for defendants and their lawyers:
- Have a basic plan in place so you can refer to it when you are sued. This typically involves one or more company leaders huddling with defense counsel to hammer out strategic details. Will the company CEO talk to the media, or should it be the company lawyer? What will be the media's most likely questions?
- Return every media call, even if your attorney's advice is to not answer questions. If you can't talk to reporters, call them back and tell them that. You may want to say something like, “We're very eager to explain why the plaintiff's claims are baseless. But we believe it's fair and ethical only to do so in front of a judge and jury.”
- If you learn of the lawsuit from a reporter, promise to get back in touch before the reporter's deadline. This will buy you time to strategize with your defense counsel.
- Because litigation may unfold over weeks, months or even years, you'll likely have multiple interactions with media interested in fresh developments in your lawsuit. You may want to anticipate these, and reach out to media to help them tell your story. If initial media coverage seemed unfair, here is your chance to shape coverage that is more favorable.
- If you determine that fair coverage from a reporter or outlet is unlikely, approach other media. For example, a local business publication may be more sympathetic to your company's position.
- If you prevail in your case, let the media know. But don't gloat, and don't trash the plaintiff.
Once the suit is resolved, it's time for a review of your performance. Did you respond in media interviews in ways that benefited your company, and mitigated the negatives effects of the lawsuit? Or did you find yourself wishing you had taken a different tack? Taking a fearless look at your performance after the fact may help you deal with the next lawsuit's media coverage.
Paul Abercrombie is a publicist and writer with Abercrombie Communications Inc. in Tampa. Contact him at [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250