Janet Reno's Niece Is in Court Fighting for the Former AG's Florida Home
The Miami-Dade Circuit Court ruled that the lifelong home of former U.S. Attorney General and Miami-Dade State Attorney Janet Reno should be gifted to Miami Dade College, but her niece Janet Meliha Reno is set to appeal, arguing the college has no right to inherit the house.
November 26, 2018 at 01:12 PM
4 minute read
Former U.S. Attorney General and Miami-Dade State Attorney Janet Reno died on Nov. 7, 2016, but the squabble over her ranch in suburban Kendall lives on.
The Miami-Dade Circuit Court ruled Reno's lifelong home should be gifted to Miami Dade College, but her niece Janet Meliha Reno is set to appeal, arguing the school has no right to inherit the house.
Reno's will, drawn up in 2008, said that the University of Miami could have the home as long as it was maintained ”as-is”—a burden the university declined, deciding it was too costly.
Reno's mother built the house from scratch in the 1940s, in what was then the Everglades. Reno inherited the house when her parents died, and spent the majority of her life there.
“A lot of politically and otherwise historic meetings were held there over the years,” said Alan Greer of Richman Greer in Miami, lead attorney for the Reno estate and a longtime friend of the former attorney general.
According to Greer, Reno wanted the house to be preserved as its one of the last natural hammocks left in Southwest Dade. As part of a hammock—an elevated clump of trees surrounded by wetlands—the area has its own ecosystem.
“It has to be dealt with as wild land that has a house on it,” said Greer. “There's upkeep and taxes and all of that sort of thing that has to be paid in perpetuity.”
Though Reno never attended UM, she looked to it as a financially sound institution.
When UM said no, Greer presented Miami Dade College as a comparable institution. He submitted a cy-près doctrine, meaning “as near as possible,” which allows the court to edit the terms of a trust if a gift can't be given exactly as it was intended.
“MDC has a similar hammock pieces of property halfway between the campus and the Reno ranch, so there's a natural nexus there,” Greer said.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Mindy S. Glazer agreed on Nov. 8, granting a final judgment in favor of the Janet Reno Revocable Trust, headed by Reno's nephew James Hurchalla.
Read the court order:
Reno, who never married or had children of her own, made seven of her nieces and nephews residuary heirs to the property. Six of them agreed the property should go to MDC.
But Hung V. Nguyen of the Nguyen Law Firm in Coral Gables represents Reno's niece and argued that the six other relatives have tried to rewrite the famed attorney's trust agreement.
“While the case involves a big name, it really comes down to property rights,” Nguyen said. “It comes down to Janet Reno's constitutional right to divide her property as she sees fit, and my client's right to inherit this property.”
The house isn't worth much, according to Nguyen, who said his client objects out of principle.
Click here to read Janet Meliha's Reno's motion for summary judgment
According to Nguyen, a cy-près doctrine should only be used if there are no back-up plans, but Reno's niece argues there are.
“In this case, the trust has clear language that says the property shall be sold and the trustee is obligated to sell the property and distribute it to the nieces and nephews,” Ngyuen said.
Nguyen also pointed to testimony of former attorney Lewis Kanner, now deceased, who claimed that Reno knew UM wasn't going to accept the gift.
For Greer, who met Reno in the 1970s while playing racquetball at former American Bar Association president Sandy D'Alemberte's house, gifting her home to MDC seems like the closest thing to Reno's original plan.
“It's a case that I feel a great responsibility for, since Janet was an old, old friend and I want to make sure her wishes were carried out,” Greer said.
Reno's niece has filed a notice of appeal, which will go to the Third District Court of Appeal.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250