PMG Inflated Unit Sizes at Luxury Sunny Isles Beach Muse Condo, Would-Be Buyer Says
The contract holder balked at the purchase of three units and wants the return of $7.17 million in deposits, claiming sales materials exaggerated unit sizes.
November 27, 2018 at 10:38 AM
5 minute read
Attorney Michael Schlesinger. Photo: AM Holt
Developer PMG has been accused of exaggerating the size of some of the units at its luxury Sunny Isles Beach Muse condominium by about 400 square feet in sales materials.
Pinellas County resident Stephen Hess was in line to buy three condos in the Carlos Ott-designed beachfront tower but now wants the return of $7.17 million in deposits, saying PMG floor plans and a fact sheet misrepresented condo sizes of 3,635 square feet, bigger than their actual size.
“Keep in mind, you can't measure it when you buy it because it wasn't built. So the purchasers are dependent on the floor plans and sales materials entirely,” said Michael Schlesinger, Hess' attorney.
The 650-foot Muse rises 50 stories and has 68 condos that with floor-to-ceiling windows and private elevators, according to the PMG and Muse websites.
PMG showed floor plans and a fact sheet that included in the square footage areas like balconies, common areas, corridors and columns, which shouldn't be in the calculation, according to the Miami-Dade Circuit Court lawsuit filed by Schlesinger.
The alleged deception was done in part through the “sly” use of the phrase “A/C area,” which refers to air conditioned areas, in sales materials even though that count included areas not under air, including the thickness of walls.
While the floor plans included a disclaimer specifying the “A/C area” includes exterior spaces, it was confusing and in a “tiny” font, according to the Nov. 5 complaint. State law requires disclaimers must be conspicuous in bold, capital letters and at least a 10-point font.
“Given the infinitesimal size of the print used to negate and disclaim the size of the units, it is only with nose-to-the-page squinting, or the aid of a magnifying glass, that one can discern what the convoluted and ambiguous disclaimer says,” according to the complaint.
Schlesinger, founder of Schlesinger Law Group in Miami, filed the suit along with J. Luis Quintana of the Quintana Law Firm in Coral Gables.
PMG attorney Josh Rubens denied the allegations, saying PMG's unit size disclosures were accurate and in line with the actual sizes. He said the lawsuit stems from a different issue — Hess' failure to close on the units.
“It was only months after plaintiffs failed to close on the units and the developer terminated their contracts that plaintiffs began alleging far-fetched claims reminiscent of the last cycle. This lawsuit is nothing more than a desperate attempt to recover the plaintiffs' deposits,” Rubens, a partner at Kluger Kaplan, said in an emailed statement. “The developer's disclosures, including regarding the size of the units and the use of deposit funds, have at all times been accurate and consistent with the condominium documents, Florida law, and the completed project.”
Hess filed the suit along with his Clearwater Beach Co. LLC, the contract holder on one of the units, against PMG-S2 Sunny Isles LLC. The limited liability company is a PMG affiliate, according to the state Division of Corporations.
While the unit size discrepancy is the main issue, Hess also alleged PMG broke state law by taking out a second construction loan Aug. 5, 2015, using Hess' deposits as collateral. That voids the purchase contracts, which is what Hess is seeking along with a refund of his deposits as well as legal fees and declaratory relief in his favor.
Collectively, the three units would have cost $15.4 million as Hess signed a contracts for unit 1901 for $5.05 million with a $2.02 million deposit and unit 2201 for $5 million with a $2.5 million deposit. Clearwater Beach's contract for unit 2101 for $5.3 million came with a $2.65 million deposit, according to the complaint.
Schlesinger said it's up to the courts to decide if the method of measuring square footage used by developers misrepresents actual sizes. If so, then developers are violating state law.
“In other cases I've had, very famous developers and architects testified under oath that this was accepted practice by developers,” Schlesinger said. “If you look under air and you get someone to measure this, it's materially less.”
In one such case, Schlesinger sued the developer of the condominium at 6000 Indian Creek Drive in Miami Beach. A February 2017 jury verdict said the developer made false and misleading statements in promotional materials and awarded Jocelyn Levy damages. Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Thomas Rebull set aside the jury verdict, and the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the judge.
New York-based PMG has other high-end condos in South Florida, including the 180-unit Echo Brickell at 1451 Brickell Ave. in Miami and the 24-unit beachfront Sage Beach at 2101 South Surf Road in Hollywood.
Its X Social Communities division also is developing urban apartment towers. X Miami, a 464-unit downtown tower at 230 NE Fourth St., is the first company project in South Florida.
Related stories:
X Miami $106M Loan was 'David Versus Goliath' Battle for Developer's Attorneys
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![South Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger South Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1e/2c/fe74b9154aafa55f1d46b4e4693b/hard-hat-construction-767x633.jpg)
South Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger
6 minute read![Vedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Vedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2024/07/Javier-Lopez-767x633.jpg)
Vedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute read![Real Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida Real Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/08/Home-loan-767x633.jpg)
Real Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Clean Is the Clean Slate Act?
- 2Florida Bar Sues Miami Attorney for Frivolous Lawsuits
- 3Donald Trump Serves Only De Facto and Not De Jure: A Status That Voids His Acts Usurping the Power of Congress or the Courts
- 4Georgia Hacker Pleads Guilty in SEC X Account Scam That Moved Markets
- 5Trump's Pick for SEC Chair Likely to Stymie Shareholder Proposals from ESG Advocates
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250