City of Miami Beach Challenged for Excessive Fines in Suit Over Short-Term Rental Ordinance
Attorney Christopher Spuches said the city's laws against Airbnb and other short-term rental services violate the Florida Constitution's clause against excessive fines.
November 29, 2018 at 07:17 PM
4 minute read
A complaint has been filed against the City of Miami Beach for allegedly using strong-arm tactics to enforce its rules against short-term rentals.
Attorney Christopher Spuches filed a complaint accusing the city of violating the Florida Constitution's excessive punishment clause Monday. The Agentis Law founding partner told the Daily Business Review his client, a Miami Beach property owner, has been unreasonably sanctioned by the city after they purportedly violated the city's ordinance restricting short-term rentals with the use of platforms such as Airbnb.
“We had tried to work this out amicably with the city, but they employed strong-arm tactics that they had no right to employ like turning off his power and water,” Spuches said to the Daily Business Review. ”[Miami Beach] left us with no choice.”
The attorney said the trouble began when his client rented out the problematic property to a rentee who himself rented it out for transient use.
“When we were alerted to that those people were immediately evicted,” Spuches asserted.
Spuches claimed his client has faced continual problems from the city despite being in compliance with the law since March 2018.
“When the homeowner did not pay the constitutionally excessive fines, the city ordered Florida Power & Light (“FPL”) to discontinue electricity to the home,” the complaint said. ”The city also ordered the Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department to discontinue water/sewer services to the home.”
Read the suit against Miami Beach:
The attorney added that the fight to turning his client's power back on—a process described as taking less than a day and as simple as a literal “flick of the switch”—took several months.
“The building director for the city of Miami Beach expressly said twice, 'We're turning it back on, we're turning it back on,” Spuches claimed, noting that the property's electricity was still off long after he'd been assured it was returning.
Although power has since been restored to the plaintiff's property, the same apparently cannot be said for its water.
“The water's been off for nine months—there's no justification under the short-term rental ordinance to turn off somebody's water,” Spuches said. “We've never seen someone's water turned off—that's a new one.”
Spuches said he filed an emergency motion with the city Wednesday to turn his client's water back on in addition to the formal complaint submitted Monday.
Commenting that some of Miami Beach's own city commissioners have called the ordinance extreme, Spuches explained that the suit will be challenging the law under the Florida Constitution's clause against excessive fines.
Miami Beach “had imposed on homeowners approximately $6.5 million in fines associated with the ordinance” as of October 2017, according to a press release announcing the lawsuit.
“The only way the city has been able to collect on these fines is to force people to sell their homes to pay the fines and that's what they're trying to do,” Spuches said of his own client's predicament.
Emomotimi S. Brisibe, the senior assistant city attorney for Miami Beach, told the Daily Business Review the suit is being handled by Aleksandr Boksner on behalf of the city.
Boksner, Miami Beach's chief deputy city attorney, did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
Related stories:
Court Weighs In on Short-Term Rentals in Private Communities
Anti-Airbnb Ad Links Short-Term Rental to Terror Attack
Miami Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Landlord's Suit Against Airbnb
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250