City of Miami Beach Challenged for Excessive Fines in Suit Over Short-Term Rental Ordinance
Attorney Christopher Spuches said the city's laws against Airbnb and other short-term rental services violate the Florida Constitution's clause against excessive fines.
November 29, 2018 at 07:17 PM
4 minute read
A complaint has been filed against the City of Miami Beach for allegedly using strong-arm tactics to enforce its rules against short-term rentals.
Attorney Christopher Spuches filed a complaint accusing the city of violating the Florida Constitution's excessive punishment clause Monday. The Agentis Law founding partner told the Daily Business Review his client, a Miami Beach property owner, has been unreasonably sanctioned by the city after they purportedly violated the city's ordinance restricting short-term rentals with the use of platforms such as Airbnb.
“We had tried to work this out amicably with the city, but they employed strong-arm tactics that they had no right to employ like turning off his power and water,” Spuches said to the Daily Business Review. ”[Miami Beach] left us with no choice.”
The attorney said the trouble began when his client rented out the problematic property to a rentee who himself rented it out for transient use.
“When we were alerted to that those people were immediately evicted,” Spuches asserted.
Spuches claimed his client has faced continual problems from the city despite being in compliance with the law since March 2018.
“When the homeowner did not pay the constitutionally excessive fines, the city ordered Florida Power & Light (“FPL”) to discontinue electricity to the home,” the complaint said. ”The city also ordered the Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department to discontinue water/sewer services to the home.”
Read the suit against Miami Beach:
The attorney added that the fight to turning his client's power back on—a process described as taking less than a day and as simple as a literal “flick of the switch”—took several months.
“The building director for the city of Miami Beach expressly said twice, 'We're turning it back on, we're turning it back on,” Spuches claimed, noting that the property's electricity was still off long after he'd been assured it was returning.
Although power has since been restored to the plaintiff's property, the same apparently cannot be said for its water.
“The water's been off for nine months—there's no justification under the short-term rental ordinance to turn off somebody's water,” Spuches said. “We've never seen someone's water turned off—that's a new one.”
Spuches said he filed an emergency motion with the city Wednesday to turn his client's water back on in addition to the formal complaint submitted Monday.
Commenting that some of Miami Beach's own city commissioners have called the ordinance extreme, Spuches explained that the suit will be challenging the law under the Florida Constitution's clause against excessive fines.
Miami Beach “had imposed on homeowners approximately $6.5 million in fines associated with the ordinance” as of October 2017, according to a press release announcing the lawsuit.
“The only way the city has been able to collect on these fines is to force people to sell their homes to pay the fines and that's what they're trying to do,” Spuches said of his own client's predicament.
Emomotimi S. Brisibe, the senior assistant city attorney for Miami Beach, told the Daily Business Review the suit is being handled by Aleksandr Boksner on behalf of the city.
Boksner, Miami Beach's chief deputy city attorney, did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApplying Neuroscience to Real Estate Development to Address Our Growing Need for Improved Well-Being
10 minute readReal Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida
3 minute readAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250