Court Backs State in Hollywood Nursing Home's Death Records Dispute
An appeals court Friday sided with the Florida Department of Health in a battle about turning over thousands of death records to a Broward County nursing…
November 30, 2018 at 01:12 PM
4 minute read
An appeals court Friday sided with the Florida Department of Health in a battle about turning over thousands of death records to a Broward County nursing home that was shut down by the state after residents died following Hurricane Irma.
A three-judge panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal overturned a decision by a Leon County circuit judge who in June directed the department to quickly turn over to The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills death certificates from across the state. The requested death certificates were from around the time of Hurricane Irma, which hit the state Sept. 10, 2017.
After residents of The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills died, Gov. Rick Scott's administration suspended the nursing home's license and its participation in the Medicaid program and ultimately moved to revoke the facility's license. The nursing home has challenged the revocation in the state Division of Administrative Hearings, and a decision in that case is pending.
In seeking 5,907 death certificates, an attorney for the nursing home indicated during a June hearing that the facility is seeking the addresses of locations where other people died during and after the massive storm. The nursing home wants to be able to analyze the data.
Leon County Circuit Judge Terry Lewis in April issued a final judgment ordering the Department of Health to turn over the death certificates, citing Florida's broad public-records law. Lewis in June found the Department of Health in contempt and ordered it to immediately release the records, shielding only information about causes of death.
The Department of Health filed an appeal after the contempt ruling, putting on hold the release of the records. The department has contended that it needs to be able to redact confidential information before releasing the death certificates.
The appeals court Friday ruled in favor of the department, finding that Lewis erred in requiring immediate disclosure of the records and in holding the department in contempt because his April judgment “was silent with regard to the department's duty to redact confidential or exempt information from the requested records.”
“After review of the record in this case, we conclude that the trial court erred in holding the department in contempt because the final judgment was not sufficiently clear and precise as to how the department was to comply with the court's order,” said the six-page ruling by appeals-court judges Lori Rowe, Ross Bilbrey and Allen Winsor. “A party cannot be held in contempt for violating a court order that is not clear and definite as to how a party should comply with the court's command. Here, the trial court erred when it held the department in contempt for failing to comply with the final judgment because the final judgment did not address whether the department was to produce the death certificates without redacting confidential or exempt information.”
In the April judgment, Lewis wrote that the department could not force the nursing home to request each death certificate by the names of the people who died. He wrote that the nursing home may “request these records with the information it has, which may only include a date range, and respondent (the department) must produce the applicable, responsive records.”
Lewis' contempt order in June more directly addressed the issue of the department redacting information before releasing the records. He ordered the department to immediately release the records “all without any review or redaction of any information or fields on the death certificates, except the 'cause of death' field, which should not be included in any of the death certificate records produced.”
But the appeals court said nothing in the underlying April judgment “addressed whether any portions of the requested records were subject to review and redaction for confidential information or information made exempt from disclosure.” It also pointed to parts of state laws that require the department to keep confidential information such as Social Security numbers and personal information about government employees including law-enforcement officers and firefighters.
The records issue is part of a series of legal disputes between The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills and the state after Hurricane Irma knocked out the facility's air conditioning. The sweltering nursing home was evacuated three days after the storm, with authorities attributing as many as 12 deaths to problems at the facility.
Jim Saunders reports for The News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Assembles as Cruise Lines Clinch Partial Victory in $439M Havana Docks Suit
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Employee's Alleged Action Lands Marriott in Court for Defamation, Negligence
Trending Stories
- 1What to Know About Naming a Law Firm
- 2Texas Shows the Way Forward in Resolving Mass Tort Gridlock
- 3Ninth Circuit Rules on Inherent Authority and FRCP 37(e)
- 4Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
- 5Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250