In Battle for Talent, South Florida Law Firms Offer Improved Parental Paid Leave Policies
High salaries can only do so much, and firms find that younger lawyers want a better work-life balance.
December 03, 2018 at 03:15 PM
5 minute read
In the battle for legal talent, Florida firms are going beyond big bonuses and diversity pledges in their efforts to attract and retain lawyers: they are now also offering generous parental leave policies.
In June, for example, Akerman extended its paid time off for parents by four weeks, matching Holland & Knight's policy, which gives 16 weeks paid leave to primary caregivers and six weeks to secondary caregivers. Holland & Knight implemented that policy in 2013.
The six weeks (plus two paid vacation weeks) were vital for Lara Rios, senior counsel at Holland & Knight, and her wife, who gave birth to their second child in July.
“Being able to be home in those early weeks are just so critical to develop a bond with your child and support your spouse who has to recover physically,” Rios said.
The legal industry's salary arms race can only go so far, especially when it comes to attorney retention. Rios says work-life balance is a hot topic nowadays, and a new generation of attorneys expects a healthy balance. That means paid parental leave policies are going to be increasingly instrumental in attracting new talent, and it will be especially crucial to have policies that account for an attorney's annual billable hours so there's no penalty for taking time off, she says.
Only 15 percent of all U.S. businesses currently have paid parental leave policies, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But in white-collar industries with tight labor pools, such policies are increasingly common, labor statistics show. The tech industry, for example, has been implementing robust paid family leave programs to attract talent for years.
“Law firms are often a trailing indicator of many things, including benefits like these,” said Kent Zimmerman, a consultant with the Zeughauser Group. “But I do think law firms are catching up in this area in enhancing benefits to attract and retain lawyers.”
Zimmerman said leave policies are fairly common at South Florida firms, especially those in the Am Law 200. Larger firms are more likely to have paid family leave, but Zimmerman says he is starting to see more higher-end boutique firms offering paid time off.
“I think it's appreciated by lawyers. And in a number of markets, firms have enhanced the benefits over the past couple of years as the market has tightened in South Florida and elsewhere,” Zimmerman said.
Joe Zumpano of Zumpano Patricios, a midsized general practice outfit, has made family leave a priority from the early days of the firm. Since 2003, attorneys and staff are given three months time off, fully paid.
And the plan is gender neutral: The father or noncaregiving spouse can also take the three months. This puts his firm in line with the paid parental leave industry first-movers, such as Susman Godfrey and Fenwick & West, which also offer full leave regardless of caregiver status.
To Zumpano, the policy signals to his attorneys that their families come first, and doubles as a way to finally do away with the “mommy track,” a long-running phenomenon where women lawyers are punished for taking time away from their careers to start a family.
“How could you end up loving a firm that would overlook that one possibly rare moment in their life?” Zumpano said. “Our firm comes second to our families. It's allowed us to succeed and I don't think we've lost a penny in that process. It's created great stability and great loyalty to our firm.”
Matt Wright, a partner at Zumpano Patricios, took three weeks off last year when his wife had their second child.
“It takes a lot of weight off of my shoulders to have [family leave],” Wright said. “To know that it's not going to hurt me to take care of my kids.”
Andie Viele, a consultant at Viele Consulting Group, says a stigma still exists for men looking to take time off after the birth of a child, as many attorneys “still feel the pressure of meeting their hours.”
To shift this stigma, not only do firms have to offer paternity or gender-neutral leave, but attorneys have to be comfortable taking it. Wright said he took the time off in part because Zumpano sat him down and encouraged him to take it to help his wife recover from the birth.
“It's a magical time when you're starting a family,” Wright said. “You don't want to miss that opportunity just to get more billable hours in.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Are 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250