NAACP Calls for Reopening Supreme Court Nominations
The call came a day after The News Service of Florida reported that the Supreme Court will not have a black justice for the first time in 36 years when Justice Peggy Quince leaves the bench on Jan. 8.
December 03, 2018 at 01:21 PM
5 minute read
The state NAACP demanded that the nomination process for three appointments to the Florida Supreme Court be reopened after a list of 11 nominees did not include any African-Americans.
The call came a day after The News Service of Florida reported that the Supreme Court will not have a black justice for the first time in 36 years when Justice Peggy Quince leaves the bench on Jan. 8. Adora Obi Nweze, president of the NAACP Florida State Conference, said in a statement that Gov. Rick Scott and the Supreme Court Judicial Nominating Commission have “failed the people of Florida.”
“No recent governor has allowed appointees to return a slate that doesn't reflect the diversity of Florida,” Nweze said. “It's a shame and disgrace we are still fighting for equality at all levels of government for black people and particularly representation on the state Supreme Court.”
She said every governor, dating back to Gov. Reubin Askew, who appointed the first black justice, Joseph Hatchett, to the Supreme Court in 1975, has assured there was at least one African-American justice on the seven-member court.
Nweze said the nominating commission, which released its 11 nominees on Tuesday, should reconvene and reconsider six African-American applicants who were among a pool of 59 lawyers and judges seeking appointment to the Supreme Court.
She also called on Gov.-elect Ron DeSantis, who takes office next month and who will make the appointments, to “stand up to” Scott and the nominating panel “and demand what all other prior governors did with a slate that reflects the diversity of our state.”
Jason Unger, a Tallahassee lawyer who is chairman of the Supreme Court Judicial Nominating Commission, declined to comment on the NAACP's request to reopen the process.
The DeSantis transition team said Friday that the incoming governor “is grateful for the work of the Judicial Nominating Commission in their assessment and selection of the nominees” to fill the upcoming court vacancies.
“The governor-elect looks forward to evaluating each potential justice and is committed to appointing the three best individuals to serve on our state's highest court,” the statement said.
In a statement Thursday, Scott's office said the governor is required by the state Constitution to make court appointments from the list provided by the nominating commission.
“Our office does not control who applies to become a judge or what applicants are sent to the governor for consideration,” said McKinley Lewis, a Scott spokesman.
But Democrats and other critics say Scott has “stacked” the judicial nominating commissions for the court system with his appointees under a provision that allows him to reject potential commission members recommended by The Florida Bar.
Under a 2001 law, the nine-member commissions include five members directly appointed by the governor, with four members recommended by The Florida Bar and appointed by the governor.
But unlike the two prior Republican governors, Jeb Bush and Charlie Crist, who accepted the Bar recommendations and made the appointments, Scott has routinely rejected Bar candidates for the nominating commissions until he has received recommended members acceptable to him.
A 2014 Florida Bar report that looked at the issue of diversity among the nominating commissions reported that at that time, which was about midway between Scott's two terms as governor, he had rejected the Bar recommendations for commission members 18 times.
Reacting to that, Florida Senate Democrats announced on Friday that they will push measures in the 2019 legislative session to overhaul the judicial nominating process.
Senate Minority Leader Audrey Gibson, D-Jacksonville, said the list of nominees for the Supreme Court without a black applicant underscores “how politicized the process has become.”
“How can a population of more than 3 million African-Americans in this state have confidence in our highest court when their voices are being silenced?” Gibson asked.
She also noted the Supreme Court Judicial Nominating Commission could have advanced up to 18 nominees under a provision that allows six nominees for each court vacancy. The vacancies are occurring because Quince and Justices Barbara Pariente and R. Fred Lewis will be forced to leave the court in January because of a mandatory retirement age.
Gibson also said the issue of diversity extends beyond the Supreme Court, with Scott failing to appoint a black judge to any of the five state district courts of appeal during his two terms. Scott has made 32 appointments to those courts.
Sen. Perry Thurston, D-Fort Lauderdale, said he is working on legislation that would restore the nominating commissions to a system that would be similar to what was in place before the law was changed in 2001.
Under the prior system, each commission included three members appointed by the governor and three appointed by the Bar. The six members then appointed the remaining three members, who were not lawyers.
Under the current structure, Thurston said “not only does the governor have absolute control over the process, he has unfettered power to select judges that are mirror reflections of his own politics and personal beliefs.”
“In a state as diverse as Florida, that cannot stand,” said Thurston, an attorney.
But with a large Republican majority in the Legislature and an incoming Republican governor, efforts to change the judicial nominating process are likely to face resistance.
Sen. Randolph Bracy, D-Orlando, filed a similar bill aimed at changing the judicial nominating process in the 2018 session. But the legislation never received a hearing. A similar proposal was rejected by the state Constitution Revision Commission last spring.
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Avoiding Inadvertent Conflict Issues With Constituents When Representing Organizational Clients
- 2Debtor-Owner Allowed to Modify Mortgage in Bankruptcy Even if Debtor Is Not Obligor Under the Mortgage Loan
- 3Legal Chief of Retailer Beyond Exiting at Tumultuous Time
- 4Law Firm Real Estate Strategy: Attorney Offices Are Out, Conference Rooms Are In
- 5AI Governance In Practice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250