The Growing Craze Behind Blockchain Art
With digital art, this has not always been possible because digital files can be easily copied. Here is where the modern technology of Blockchain has merged with art to create a thriving new digital art marketplace.
December 03, 2018 at 10:55 AM
5 minute read
They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. However, the world of art is not just about beauty. It is about originality, creativity and source. When you buy art that catches your eye you want to be sure it is genuine. With digital art, this has not always been possible because digital files can be easily copied. Here is where the modern technology of Blockchain has merged with art to create a thriving new digital art marketplace.
Blockchain is the hot topic in business and system design these days. At its simplest terms, Blockchain technology is a highly encrypted, redundant set of digital ledgers to which you can add presumably incorruptible blocks of information. These digital ledgers are kept in multiple locations and the changes are checked so that only legitimate changes are made to the chain. So, for example, if someone purchased a car using a Blockchain transaction and then each service call or transfer of ownership were added as information blocks to the Blockchain as they happened, you could safely purchase the car knowing its entire history since purchase. In fact, when you bought the car your purchase information would become another block in the chain and would be part of the unchangeable record duplicated in these ledgers for future buyers. Blockchains and smart contracts are far more complex than this but for our purposes, this explanation should suffice.
Since authenticity or, as it is generally referred to in, provenance is so important to art and so hard to establish in digital works, Blockchain is a godsend for digital art. An artist can create a piece of art, link it by a unique digital key to a Blockchain and not only the origin, but all conditions of its creation and subsequent transfers of ownership or value will be permanently documented in the Blockchain. This is exactly what has been happening.
One of the first and most popular forms of Blockchain art was CryptoPunks. These were 10,000 unique 24×24 pixel drawings of punky looking guys and girls with a few rarer ones of apes, zombies and aliens. These unique tiny works of art were developed and sold on the popular Ethereum Blockchain platform. When you buy a CryptoPunk, you know that you own a verifiably unique piece of art from a limited set of 10,000. You can then buy and sell these digital drawings at auction to other Ethereum users using the Ethereum crypto currency called Ether. CrytoPunks often sold for less than $100, but some are selling at auction for upwards of $5,500.
A slightly different approach to Blockchain art was taken by the Rare Pepe folks. A Rare Pepe is a digital trading card showing sometimes wildly whimsical versions of Pepe the frog, a meme that has been around the internet since 2005. You buy Rare Pepe cards by opening a Rare Pepe Wallet to buy and sell the cards using bitcoin. The cards are assets on the Bitcoin Blockchain and each one is unique. One invocation that the Rare Pepe community adds is that you, the user, can draw your own digital Rare Pepe drawing, place it in a digital card frame and submit it to the community. Your art can then become another unique Rare Pepe artwork that can be bought and sold at auction. Last year, a Homer Simpson Rare Pepe digital card sold for the bitcoin equivalent of $39,000.
Yet another Blockchain art market that pushes the vision of digital art is Cryptokitties. Cryptokitties are digital renderings of kittens with unique colors and patterns. As with Cryptopunks, a limited initial set was produced. In the case of Cryptokitties, only 50,000 were created and added to the Ethereum Blockchain. What makes Cryptokitties different is that you can pay to breed (yes I said breed) two Cryptokitties and the smart contract (software program) that governs the art will create a unique new Cryptokitty that you can buy and sell at auction. In other words, you can increase the number of Cryptokitties by creating new generations created from combinations of the previous generations. In December of last year, a Cryptokitty sold for $120,000 and total Cryptokitty investment allegedly exceeds $11 million.
While traditional auction houses are still not selling Blockchain art directly, they have not been inattentive of this growing trend. London-based Christies, one of the oldest auction houses in the world, is starting a pilot program with Artory to record art transactions on the Blockchain creating a verifiable ownership record. In September, Maecenas, an art investment platform built on Blockchain, sold tokenized interest (where different bidders get a piece of interest in the work) in Andy Warhol's “14 Small Electric Chairs (1980).” The auction sold 31.5 percent of ownership rights for the two-meter high painting, raising around $1.7 million.
Paying tens of thousands of dollars for a Rare Pepe or a Cryptokitty may seem crazy to you but, as this craze grows and develops, it might be worth your time to know what art is growing on the Blockchains. Who knows? You might discover and own the next digital Picasso.
Jorge Espinosa is managing partner with the Miami intellectual property boutique law firm of Espinosa Martinez. He focuses his practice on the domestic and international protection of trademarks, patents and copyrights. He may be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Initial Steps to Set Up a Fla. Appeal: Your Future Self (or Appellate Attorney) Will Thank You
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250