State Elections Officials: Tweaks Needed, But No Major Overhaul
In their estimation, the November election went as it should have.
December 04, 2018 at 11:49 AM
4 minute read
As Florida's elections supervisors meet for the first time since the Nov. 6 election, they say that despite some recent problems, the majority of the counties handled things smoothly.
The Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections is meeting in Sarasota this week.
In their estimation, the November election went as it should have.
“The system worked very, very well,” said Alan Hayes, supervisor of elections in Lake County, adding that 66 of 67 counties met the recount deadline. “There are changes that need to be made, but not a drastic overhaul.”
The supervisors were quick to acknowledge problems. Palm Beach County, for instance, missed the recount deadline because of outdated equipment. Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher wasn't at the Sarasota gathering.
“She's counting ballots as we speak,” said Hays, who added that Bucher plans to buy new equipment.
This year's recounts made some recall the 2000 presidential election, when it took Florida more than five weeks to certify George W. Bush the winner. This year it took two weeks certify Nov. 6 election results due to close races, recounts and controversies. Florida was roasted on late night TV shows and was again the butt of jokes.
Yet even amid the criticism, some officials observed a spirit of civility.
During the throes of the recount, Volusia County Supervisor of Elections Lisa Lewis noticed that lawyers for candidates from both parties, along with observers, bought each other snacks as both the machine and hand recounts dragged on. They brought in coffee for everyone in the mornings. They laughed together.
“I thought, this is how elections should be,” said Lewis.
Broward County was at the center of complaints this year. Governor Rick Scott suspended Broward Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes for misfeasance, incompetence and neglect of duty. Scott cited problems during the recount, including reports of more than 2,000 ballots being misplaced. Snipes, who was appointed by then-Gov. Jeb Bush in 2003, has been elected three times. She had announced her resignation before Scott suspended her, and over the weekend, she rescinded her resignation.
She wasn't at the Sarasota meeting.
Legislators have said they will scrutinize elections laws during next year's session to avoid problems in 2020, the next major election. Among the possibilities: changing the timelines and deadlines for recounting ballots, and extending the absentee ballot timeline.
“No matter how well it works, there's always ways to look for it to be better,” said Lori Scott, Brevard County's supervisor of elections. Expanding the days to count the mail-in ballots might be a good idea, she said, because so many people vote by mail now and it is a crush of work for larger counties. Currently, counties can open mail ballots and begin counting them 15 days before the election.
All supervisors agreed that voter outreach and education are key, especially in the era of social media.
Hays said voters “should also accept responsibility” and make sure their ballots are marked correctly, with proper signatures, so they're easily processed when the time comes to count.
Scott said she's had to battle rumor and outright lies because people spread misinformation on Twitter and Facebook. She recently went on a radio program and a caller asked why mail ballots are only counted close races, and why ballots with under votes aren't counted.
Neither of those things are true, Scott said. All mail ballots are counted, and ballots where a voter didn't fill in a race or question aren't thrown out. Some people just don't have enough information to vote in a race or an amendment and often leave those blank — but the other, completed portions of the ballot are counted.
“It's really important that collectively, we as citizens and voters not pass on disinformation that undermines the confidence of the electoral process,” she said.
Tamara Lush reports for the Associated Press.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readStep 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250