South Florida Attorney Suspended for 3 Years Following Insider Trading Charge
Donald Tescher has been suspended from practicing law for three years after the Florida Supreme Court rejected the disciplinary recommendation of his court-appointed referee.
December 05, 2018 at 02:46 PM
3 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court has dealt a three-year suspension order to a veteran South Florida lawyer accused of insider trading.
The high court issued an order suspending Boca Raton attorney Donald Tescher on Friday. Because he had already been suspended indefinitely, his three-year sanction commenced immediately upon the motion's filing.
The Florida Bar's ethics case against Tescher was assembled in light of insider trading charges against him and four other Floridians by the SEC in 2015. The federal agency alleged that Tescher was one of several individuals to illegally profit from the sale of pharmaceutical company Pharmasset to California-based biotechnology company Gilead Sciences.
Read the suspension order:
In 2011, Tescher was informed by one his clients, a board member of Pharmasset, that the company was slated to be sold to Gilead for a considerable sum. The longtime tax attorney purchased $10,000 in Pharmasset stock shortly after receiving the tip.
According to the SEC, Tescher and affiliated parties sold their stock following Gilead's purchase and collectively netted more than $234,000 in earnings. Tescher opted to settle with the SEC upon having charges filed against him and paid in excess of $20,000 to the agency; besides a prejudgment interest of $690, his settlement was split evenly between his gains of $9,937 from the Pharmasset sale and the $9,937 fine issued against him.
In August 2017, West Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Peter Evans, the Florida Bar referee appointed to Tescher's case, found that he was guilty of violating Florida Bar rules. The judge recommended that Tescher only receive a one-year suspension in light of his lack of disciplinary history, prompt settlement and other mitigating factors.
Although the state Supreme Court accepted Evans' findings, they rejected his recommended sanction for Tescher. A July 2018 motion responding to the referee's suggested disciplinary action signaled the high court's inclination to impose a stringent punishment against Tescher. In addition to suspending him indefinitely, the filing asked him to show cause as to “why the referee's recommended sanction should not be disapproved and a more severe sanction, up to and including disbarment, be imposed.”
Tescher, who was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1969, had accumulated a number of accolades and prestigious titles to his name prior to his suspension. He had previously served as the chair of the Florida Bar's tax section in addition to serving on its Real Property Executive Council for two decades before the case against him was opened in 2016.
Tescher offered no comment on his suspension when reached by the Daily Business Review. His counsel, Miami litigator David Rothman, declined to comment as well.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250