Bad News for Airbnb: Miami Court Reinstates Ban on Vacation Rentals
The Third DCA lifted a court injunction that had stopped the City of Miami from banning vacation rentals. With the ban reinstated, Airbnb hosts in some Miami neighborhoods will no longer be able to rent out their homes.
December 06, 2018 at 02:44 PM
4 minute read
The Third District Court of Appeal (DCA) on Wednesday ruled that the City of Miami can block residents from renting out their homes for less than a month at a time, throwing the future of vacation rental companies like California-based Airbnb Inc. into uncertainty. The move reverses Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Beatrice Butchko's earlier ruling, which temporarily halted the ban.
The dispute began in April 2017, when Airbnb and five Miami residents sued the city, claiming it was running an “aggressive anti-Airbnb campaign.”
This alleged campaign began at a March 2017 commission meeting, when the city adopted a rule that would ban short-term vacation rentals in certain residential areas. Under the rule, any temporary rentals in T3 or “suburban” zones — meaning single family and two family homes — would violate the city's zoning code, Miami 21.
Airbnb's online hosting service allows anyone in the world to rent a home for temporary stays, like vacations or business trips. Though Miami's rental ban doesn't strictly apply to Airbnb, the company would likely be hardest hit.
Click here to read Airbnb's full complaint against the City of Miami
According to the lawsuit, the city had no legal basis to enforce a rental ban. Instead, the complaint alleged, it relied on a creative interpretation of Miami's zoning code, which doesn't mention vacation rentals by name.
The complaint listed various reasons why the five Miami residents — Yamile Bell, Ana Rubio, Gary M. Levin, Toya Bowles and Kenneth J. Tobin — choose to rent out their homes via Airbnb. Tobin cited security reasons, claiming he preferred having people rent his home while he was out of town, while Bell argued the extra income was crucial to her family.
But the Third DCA cast doubt on the plaintiff's likelihood of success and ruled the trial court's injunction against the ban was too vague to remain in place. The ruling is the latest in a string of cases involving Airbnb and other lodging companies, as courts around the country grapple with the new phenomenon of short-term vacation rentals.
Attorneys for the City of Miami, Victoria Mendez, John Greco and Christopher A. Green did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
City Attorney Miriam Ramos represents the City of Coral Gables, which filed an amicus brief, or “friend of the court” document in support of Miami. Coral Gables managed to ban short-term rentals in residential zones without much fuss, as its preexisting regulations were less ambiguous.
Click here to read Coral Gables' amicus brief
While Ramos admitted that short-term rentals make sense for certain residential communities, she doesn't think it works for Miami and Coral Gables. In Ramos' view, the decision to allow vacation rentals should rest with local — not state — government.
According to Ramos, the main concern for Coral Gables residents is security.
“There's a sense of community and a sense of safety in the idea that you know your neighbors,” Ramos said. “When the person next door is a different person every week, decent as they might be, it provokes anxiety for residents who want to feel like a community.”
Airbnb's lawsuit relies on the Florida Legislature, which recognized in 2011 that regulating vacation rentals was a job for the state, according to the complaint.
Counsel to the plaintiffs, Mitchell W. Berger, Paul S. Figg, Paul Avron and Fred Goldberg of Berger Singerman in Fort Lauderdale, did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Third DCA Judge Thomas Logue wrote the opinion, with which Judge Norma S. Lindsey concurred. Judge Barbara Lagoa dissented in part, agreeing that the injunction was too broad but arguing that it should be edited, not reversed.
Read the full court order:
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250