Miami Big Firm Partners Report High Compensation but Low Job Satisfaction, Survey Says
The survey also found that nationally, male partners make on average 53 percent more than their female counterparts.
December 06, 2018 at 12:03 PM
3 minute read
|
The average compensation for big firm partners in Miami surpassed the national average last year, according to a new survey by Major, Lindsey & Africa.
Miami partners reported a 10 percent increase in yearly compensation, from $847.000 to $937,000, whereas the average compensation nationally went from $855,000 to $877,000, the survey said.
The study covered the period from September 2017 through August 2018.
For the study, Major, Lindsey & Africa researchers surveyed 1,390 partners nationwide. Respondents were asked 30 questions on several topics, including primary practice area, gender, firm size, ethnicity, total compensation and satisfaction.
The report broke down responses by city, although Miami had among one of the lowest partner response rates, (2 percent), making it “difficult to draw meaningful conclusions,” according to the report's authors.
Miami partners also reported a 17 percent increase in annual billable hours, from 1,508 to 1,766. Billing rates took a small 1 percent jump, from $652 in 2016 to $658. Partners nationwide reported an average 5 percent jump in billing rates, from $685 to $718.
Satisfaction rates for Miami partners are either the lowest, or among the lowest, in the country, according to the survey. An estimated 10 percent of partners said they are “very satisfied” with their job, and 13 percent said they are very satisfied with their compensation. In Minneapolis, where partners reported the lowest compensation, 30 percent said they were very satisfied with their job and compensation. Nationally, satisfaction rates averaged 22 percent for 2017 and 31 percent for 2016.
Other major findings include a national 53 percent pay gap between male and female partners. While male partners take home an average $959,000 in compensation each year, women reported an average salary of $627,000. The gap extends to billing rates, with female partners reporting an average of $650 and males reporting an average of $736 (a year over year increase of 2 percent and 5 percent respectively).
Unsurprisingly, New York partners boast the highest salaries — nearly $1.5 million on average, with Silicon Valley coming in second at $1.2 million a year. On the low end of the pay scale are cities such as Minneapolis and Seattle, with average annual salaries of $539,000 and $637,000 respectively. Between practice areas, labor and employment partners reported the lowest average compensation at $681,000, while corporate partners reported the highest, nearly $1.2 million annually.
|Related Stories:
New Survey Finds Even Bigger Gender Gap in Big Law Partner Pay
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readGrowing Referral Network, Alternative Fees Have This Ex-Big Law’s Atty’s Bankruptcy Practice Soaring
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250