David Boies Praises Class Actions as Instruments of Equality
Boies made the remarks at the Class Action and Complex Litigation Forum held at the University of Miami
December 07, 2018 at 06:24 PM
2 minute read
|
David Boies, chairman of Boies Shiller Flexner, argued in defense of class action lawsuits in a keynote speech he delivered at a legal conference at the University of Miami on Friday.
“The class action is a mechanism for bringing more equality to our adversarial system,” said Boies. “It allows people to confront a very well-resourced institution.”
Boies made the remarks at the Class Action and Complex Litigation Forum at the University of Miami campus.
In a 40-minute speech, Boies traced the history of class action lawsuits from their origins in medieval Europe to the 1966 amendment to Rule 23 that created the modern class action.
The prolific litigator has had experience on both sides of class action suits and defended their use in the face of what he considers “dangerous” acts of restriction. He pointed specifically to the 2011 Supreme Court AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, a 5-to-4 decision which ruled that arbitration clauses in contracts can prevent consumers from bringing class action lawsuits.
Boies said he understands the chief complaints against class actions—namely that bad actors bringing frivolous cases and that such suits can wreak a great deal of financial damage on a company—but he said reform should focus on increasing efficiency, not restrictions. The class action serves an important purpose, he said, acting as a deterrent.
For example, cases can be shorter when attorneys are paid via percentage fees instead of through a lodestar method, which he said incentivizes attorneys to rack up billing and protract the suit. Both the plaintiff and the defendant want a shorter case, but the lodestar method could tempt an attorney to drag out the lawsuit.
“The lodestar trap gives everybody—the defendants counsel and plaintiffs counsel—an incentive that is contrary to the interest of the class and of the defendant,” he said.
The forum covered other topics in the mass tort and class action realm, including third-party financing, hot topics in mass torts and best practices in multidistrict litigation. The panels were populated by judges, including Southern District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga and 11th Circuit Judge John W. Thornton Jr., as well as attorneys from across the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWinston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
2 minute readWith Florida’s Lateral Hiring Remaining Steady in 2024, Here’s the Top Hires Throughout the State
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
- 2'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
- 3Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Del. Courts to Address in 2025
- 4U.S. Supreme Court Has No Jurisdiction Over Trump's New York Criminal Case: Prosecutors
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: With KPMG's Proposed Entry, Arizona's Liberalized Legal Market is Getting Interesting
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250