Fla. Supreme Court for 2nd Time Rejects Proposed Discipline for Miami-Dade Judge
In a 5-2 decision on Friday, the Florida Supreme Court said no to the latest sanctions proposed by the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC) and Miami-Dade County Court Judge Maria Ortiz, charged with violating the judicial code of conduct by accepting free hotel stays with her husband, a government official who allegedly took them as bribes.
December 07, 2018 at 04:50 PM
3 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court has, for the second time, rejected the stipulated discipline for Miami-Dade County Court Judge Maria D. Ortiz, who was accused of accepting free hotel stays with her husband, Mariano Fernandez, former director of Miami Beach's building department, who allegedly took them as bribes.
The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC) charged Ortiz with ethics violations in May, while her husband lost his job and faces corruption charges.
In June, the justices rejected Ortiz's first stipulation agreement, in which the JQC had recommended a public reprimand and $5,000 fine.
The JQC went back to the drawing board Oct. 29, filing a revised stipulation. In it, Ortiz agreed to cover the JQC's court costs and serve a 30-day suspension without pay, in addition to the fine and public reprimand, Ortiz also admitted that she failed to “take reasonable steps” or “make specific inquiry” about how the trips were paid for.
At a recent evidentiary hearing, Ortiz claimed she rarely checked her financial statements and receipts because her husband Fernandez took care of their joint account.
“I never worried about amounts. I always lived very frugally. That was the way it was,” Ortiz said at the hearing.
Ortiz's lawyer, David B. Rothman of Rothman & Associates in Miami, would not comment on the case.
In the revised stipulation, the JQC maintained that it believed Ortiz was negligent but conceded in its response that despite Fernandez's alleged criminal conduct, it would likely be unable to prove the judge intentionally violated the judicial canons.
JQC attorney Alex Williams declined to comment.
Justices Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis, Peggy Quince, Ricky Polston and Jorge Labarga stood by the decision, which suggested a longer, 90-day suspension. But Justice Alan Lawson dissented, saying he would accept the stipulation agreed by Ortiz and the JQC. Chief Justice Charles T. Canady joined in Lawson's dissent.
The 5-2 decision sent the case back to the JQC for reconsideration. If no agreement is reached, the Hearing Panel of the Commission will hold a final hearing and send a recommendation to the high court, which will make its own decision.
Read the court order:
Related stories:
Miami-Dade County Court Judge Accepts Suspension for Ethics Violations
Bad News for Two South Florida Judges Facing Discipline: High Court Rejects Stipulations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner
3 minute readForum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250