Lawsuit Filed Against Marriott International Over 'Unnatural Smell' at St. Regis Bal Harbour Penthouse
The complaint filed in Miami-Dade Circuit Court alleges Marriott concealed from residents and guests that insulation material used to sound-proof the building may have emitted harmful chemicals and odors.
December 07, 2018 at 04:05 PM
5 minute read
A lawsuit filed in Miami-Dade County has accused Marriott International of knowingly concealing the use of an odious and potentially harmful building material in one of its properties.
Montreal businessman Andreas Diamantopoulos is accusing Marriott of negligence and fraud over its addressing of an “unnatural smell” in his residence in the company's St. Regis Bal Harbor Resort. Diamantopoulos — who goes by Andre Diamond — claimed to have continually reached out to St. Regis management over the presence of “a highly nauseating, repulsive, and repugnant odor” pervading his property. Diamond purchased a two-bedroom penthouse at the resort for $2,525,000 in 2013.
“Diamond complained multiple times about the chemical stench and persistent odor but was continuously shuffled along by management, engineers and staff at the St. Regis Property, all of whom outright denied any issue existed,” the complaint said.
The filing maintained the smell was so strong that “even when sleeping with his sliding glass doors open, Diamond would wake up in the morning with eye irritation and burns, headaches, respiratory difficulty, and diminished cognitive capabilities.”
Read the complaint:
Diamond didn't learn the source of his discomfort until November 2017, when a contractor inspecting his residence identified the problem in short order.
“The general contractor recognized the odor instantaneously and explained that the distinct odor Diamond complained of was the same exact odor that was remediated in many other units on the St. Regis Property several years back,” the suit said. Diamond was told the problematic scent stemmed from chemicals off-gassing from the vinyl substance used to muffle the sound of water running through the St. Regis' pipes.
Although the origin of the issue had been identified, Diamond alleges it has yet to be corrected one year onward. According to Miami litigator Richard Segal, the ongoing discomfort Diamond has experienced at the St. Regis is at odds with the considerable sums of money he's put into the property.
“Everyone who buys into St. Regis buys into it for the flagship service that is normally associated with that brand,” he said. Segal, who is representing Diamond alongside his Segal Zuckerman partner Jamie Zuckerman, said his client has been “severely disappointed” with the treatment he's received given the severity of the matter.
“In light of the building and the brand, this issue should have been taken care of much more expeditiously than it has,” he continued.
Marriott is named as a defendant in the complaint alongside Seldar, a Florida-based and real estate-oriented subsidiary of the Al Faisal Holding Co. in Qatar; the international hotel chain is responsible for the active management of the St. Regis, while Seldar serves as the property's owners.
Diamond's complaint includes several charges of negligence and fraud in addition to purporting a violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
“Acknowledging and admitting that Diamond's Penthouse Condominium was contaminated posed a problem for Marriott because Marriott wanted to preserve the purported ultra-luxury reputation associated with the St. Regis brand and did not want the public to know of the pervasive and continued off-gassing problem that plagued the St. Regis Property,” the filing said. “The actions of Marriott were intentional, willful, wanton, malicious and performed with a reckless disregard for Diamond's property, health, well-being, and rights.”
Segal said even if the matter were to be corrected, Diamond would still be reluctant to reenter his dormant penthouse.
“Who would want to go back into their penthouse, even if it was fixed, not knowing how pervasive [the off-gassing] was?,” he asked. “Now that [Diamond] is starting to better understand the facts, he wants to know exactly what was going on, the chemicals he was breathing in and the odors he was exposed to.”
Zuckerman said no counsel has entered an appearance on behalf of either defendant as of yet.
A Marriott representative told the Daily Business Review the company does not comment on pending litigation. The hotel conglomerate has recently come under scrutiny for a data breach that may have exposed the personal information of as many as 500 million customers.
A request for comment from Seldar's parent company, the Al Faisal Holding Co., was not returned by press time.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Clarifies Qualifications for Court-Appointed Arbitrators
3 minute read$5.5M Miami Verdict: Meet the Lawyers Behind the Slip-and-Fall Suit
US Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, and End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
- 2Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 3NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 4Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 5DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250