$53 Million Judgment Follows Retrial Before New Judge
Most Effective Lawyers: Complex/business litigation — Attorneys for Miami-Dade County's toll-by-plate operator won two trials but face another appeal.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
Michael Piscitelli and Brad Copenhaver
Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli
Lawrence Silverman and Gerald Cope Jr.
Akerman
After an extensive tour through the courts, attorneys from Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli and Akerman obtained a favorable final order for Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp. in a lawsuit against the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, which is now on appeal.
The county originally contracted with ETC in 2009 to provide a toll collection and accounting system for the five major Miami-Dade expressways when SunPass transponders aren't used.
After a major falling out, ETC sought $58 million in damages for contract payments for the toll-by-plate system used on the toll roads. MDX responded with a $25 million counterclaim for liquidated damages under the contract for late or faulty performance.
In 2012, the court granted summary judgment against ETCC on a significant portion of its claims. In 2015, a three-week bench trial was held, and the court tentatively awarded $28 million in damages to ETC against MDX, reversed the previous summary judgment ruling and reopened the case for further evidence on damages.
MDX responded by asking to disqualify the judge, and the disqualification was ordered by the Third District Court of Appeal in 2017, teeing up a retrial.
Following a second three-week trial, Miami Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas awarded $43 million in damages to ETC last December and entered a $53.3 million final judgment including interest in January.
“It was a big-deal case, very expensive on both sides,” Michael Piscitelli of Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli in Fort Lauderdale said in April after a rehearing request was denied. The retrial “was quite a bit more contentious.”
MDX attorney Joseph Serota of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman in Coral Gables filed a notice of appeal, extending the life of the long case.
Piscitelli said the company's two law firms plan to co-author the appellate brief due next year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
2 minute read'You Lied to the Jury': Veteran Awarded $5 Million in Defamation Case Against CNN
4 minute readVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250