In Hotel Data Breach, Fowler White Team Wins Coverage Denial for St. Paul Insurance
Most Effective Lawyers: Insurance — A federal judge allowed Travelers' St. Paul subsidiary to deny coverage for the fallout from malware installed on the Rosen hotel chain's payment network.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
Rory Eric Jurman and Steven S. Cula
Fowler White Burnett
The Fowler White Burnett attorneys found some beneficial limits for their client on insurance coverage after a data breach.
Fort Lauderdale shareholder Rory Eric Jurman and associate Steven S. Cula represented Travelers unit St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. in a $2.4 million federal coverage dispute and prevailed on summary judgment.
U.S. District Judge Carlos Mendoza ruled St. Paul had no duty to defend Orlando-based Rosen Hotels & Resorts Inc.'s information technology subsidiary Rosen Millennium against allegations that the company was to blame for a data breach that exposed hotel customers' credit card data.
The company began receiving reports from former guests of unauthorized charges in early 2016. A forensic investigator tracked the breach to external malware installed on the hotel chain's payment network.
St. Paul owed no duty to defend the IT group under the personal injury provisions of its commercial general liability policies, the court found in September, rejecting Rosen Millennium's theories of coverage. Rosen filed a notice of appeal in October.
The court noted St. Paul never conceded coverage and didn't waive its right to deny coverage in a June 16, 2017, coverage letter.
Rosen Millennium sought coverage under the Rosen Hotels policy for property damage tied to the credit cards and the cost of complying with breach notification laws. Rosen was fined by Visa, MasterCard and American Express for the security breach, and other costs piled up.
The decision came down to an interpretation of the personal injury policy provisions and whether they covered claims for a data breach by third-party hackers.
A 2017 Middle District of Florida case asking a similar coverage question faulted hackers rather than the policyholder for a data breach under a policy that focused on coverage triggered by the publication of private information. Since the policyholder did not qualify as the publisher, there was no coverage.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 2The Definition of Special Employment
- 3People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 4Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
- 5Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250