Ratzan Law Group Wins $45M Award in Death of Med Student During I-75 Construction
Most Effective Lawyers: Personal injury — Stuart Ratzan persuaded a jury to hold Ranger Construction Industries liable for a late-night crash in an Interstate 75 construction zone in Pembroke Pines.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
Stuart Ratzan
Ratzan Law Group
The driver of a heavily loaded tractor-trailer made a U-turn from the Interstate 75 median during construction late at night in Pembroke Pines, triggering collisions that killed two people in 2015.
The family of medical student Jonathan Raymond Astaphan won a $45 million award from a jury that found Ranger Construction Industries Inc. was negligent and violated its contract with the state.
After a four-week trial, the jury apportioned fault equally between the Ranger and truck driver Juan Calero and found West Palm Beach-based Ranger vicariously liable for the full award.
Stuart Ratzan argued a Ranger supervisor told Calero to maneuver the 80,000-pound truck loaded with concrete barriers onto the highway and then left, leaving Calero unsupervised and without others to warn oncoming drivers about the hazard ahead. The roof of Astaphan's Mitsubishi Lancer was sheared off in the collision, and he died at the scene.
A Broward Circuit Court jury sided with the family of Astaphan, 29, of Dominica in October 2017.
Ratzan and colleagues Stuart Weissman and Evan Gilead argued Ranger acted recklessly by not closing lanes and positioning extra lights before Calero's maneuver with his northbound flatbed. Calero was asked to follow his southbound supervisor.
Ranger argued it complied with its contract with the Florida Department of Transportation and denied responsibility for the crash because Calero was a subcontractor.
Ratzan argued Ranger was required by contract to not disrupt the traffic flow with construction equipment. The contract also required lane closures to allow construction vehicles to safely merge with other traffic.
The jury imposed $20 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages on Ranger. Calero was assigned $5,000 in punitive damages.
The verdict showed the jury “understood that highway construction companies must follow the rules,” Ratzan said shortly afterward.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Attorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
- 2Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 3Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 4Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 5Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250