Pressure Cooker Explosion That Severely Burned Toddler Nets $27M Settlement
Most Effective Lawyers: Products liability — The law firm did its own testing before discovering an unreported change in manufacturing hid a flaw in a pressure cooker that seriously injured a 2-year-old girl.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
John Uustal, Michael Hersh and Catherine Darlson
Kelley/Uustal
The Consumer Product Safety Commission, police and firefighters found no defect in a pressure cooker after a toddler suffered debilitating burns that required amputations.
A pressure cooker burst beside 2-year-old Samantha Gonzalez when her grandmother was bathing her in the kitchen sink in 2015.
After public agencies found no fault with the kitchen appliance, Kelley/Uustal hired engineering experts — who reached the same conclusion.
Attorneys John Uustal, Michael Hersh and Catherine Darlson thought they had reached a dead end until they noted Samantha's father reported slipping on liquid outside the kitchen.
“Why would there be liquid on the floor outside the kitchen?” Uustal asked. They inspected the kitchen, reviewed police photos again and noticed tiny food particles scattered all over the kitchen, especially the ceiling.
They concluded the pressure cooker opened under pressure. Reviewing the evidence again, they found a neighbor reported hearing the grandmother shouted, “It exploded! It exploded!” Police photos showed the pressure cooker was open.
The legal team concluded the pressure cooker release valve activated by mistake, causing Samantha's grandmother to grab the pressure cooker. A split-second later, the device exploded and shot into the sink.
Additional testing by the law firm's own laboratory and testing staff, who found the pressure cooker had the wrong size internal lockbar, which meant the lock didn't actually lock.
The company fixed the problem after the first three years of manufacturing without reporting the change, which meant the comparison devices used in the testing were not defective.
The defendant's engineering expert conceded the defect in Samantha's case, which settled for $27 million. She lost a leg including one hip, a foot and all of her fingers. The funds will cover medical care, including plastic surgery and technologically advanced prosthetics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Investment and Dispute Resolution in the Wake of Mexico’s Dramatic Judicial Reform
5 minute readRevenue Sharing Enhances the Benefits of Community Development Districts to Developers and Local Governments
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250