13 Years Into Case, Morgan Lewis Team Knocks Out MERS MDL in Ninth Circuit
Most Effective Lawyers: Real estate litigation — Defended by Morgan Lewis, the national electronic mortgage registry has been fighting cases since before the foreclosure crisis.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
Robert M. Brochin, Clay M. Carlton and Ann Kerr Stewart
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Drawn into a Miami case 13 years ago, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius partner Robert Brochin has been defending MERSCORP Holdings Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. ever since.
Now designated the company's national litigation counsel, Brochin has traveled across country and jurisdictions in defense of the electronic mortgage registry, which tracks changes in servicing rights, among other things.
The Morgan Lewis team wrapped up 10 years of litigation on behalf of MERS when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment on the sole remaining claim of robo-signing forgery in In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Litigation.
The MERS multidistrict litigation covered 93 cases, including 10 class actions, that were transferred from federal courts around the United States.
Associates Clay M. Carlton and Ann Kerr Stewart were on the team that organized and implemented key defense action steps throughout the MDL life cycle.
Plaintiffs challenged MERS's formation, operation and legal business model. The MDL court dismissed the 93 lawsuits in the master complaint, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed.
Off the top of his head, Brochin rattled off seven federal circuits where he has argued or briefed cases, then checked to find it was nine. Cases have been addressed in 38 federal district courts.
Seven cases went to state supreme courts. He argued public reporting requirements before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in September and hopes for a decision by year-end.
Questions have been raised through the years about MERS's role in recording, liens, transfers and negotiable instruments, and the volume of cases ballooned during the foreclosure crisis.
“There was no precedent, so everybody felt they had something to say that was new and creative,” he said. “And we carried the day.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250