South Florida Judges Dominate List of Florida Supreme Court Nominees
Statutorily, one judge must reside in the Third District Court of Appeals, which covers South Florida.
December 11, 2018 at 02:08 PM
4 minute read
Over half of the 11 nominees to the Florida Supreme Court hail from South Florida.
The overrepresentation is in part because one of the open seats must be filled with a nominee who lives in the third appellate district, which includes Miami-Dade and Monroe counties.
Justices Barbara Pariente, Fred Lewis, and Peggy Quince are facing mandatory retirement, leaving Florida Governor-elect Ron DeSantis three seats to fill before his inauguration on Jan. 8.
A total of 6 of the 11 nominees are from South Florida. The three eligible for the Third DCA seat are John Daniel Couriel, Barbara Lagoa and Robert J, Luck. The other two at-large seats have no geographical restrictions.
Lagoa has the most appellate experience and is the chief justice-elect for the Third DCA, having spent 12 years on the bench and authoring 336 majority opinions. Before her appointment, she worked for three years as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of Florida.
As a judge, Luck has both trial and appellate experience. He was appointed to the Third DCA by Florida Gov. Rick Scott in 2017. Previously, Luck presided in the Criminal, Civil and Appellate Divisions of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, a position he held for four years. Luck also spent five years, from 2008 to 2013, as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of Florida.
Couriel is the only nominee vying for the Third District seat who isn't a judge. Couriel is a partner at Kobre & Kim who focuses his practice on “high-stakes cross-border disputes, with a particular focus on Latin America,” according to his attorney bio. Like Lagoa and Luck, Couriel worked as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of Florida.
Appellate experience is always a big plus for aspiring Supreme Court justices, according to University of Florida Law School Professor Joseph Little. Appellate judges who have trial experience have an even bigger advantage, he said.
“I think it's important to have a couple of judges with trial experience on the court,” said Little, who stressed that he has no knowledge of the internal decision-making in the DeSantis administration.
And while rare, it's not unheard of to have an attorney elevated to Florida's highest court. Former Chief Justice Charles Wells was an attorney when he was appointed by former Gov. Lawton Chiles. Justice R. Fred Lewis, who is one of the justices facing mandatory retirement next year, also came from private practice.
It's worth noting that Florida Republicans have long chastised the court for rulings that run contrary to their agenda. Pariente, Lewis, and Quince ruled with the 4-3 majority in Bush v. Gore, for example, and were also involved in the blocking of the 24-hour waiting period on abortions. Some see these open seats as an opportunity to make the court more conservative. Luck and Couriel are both tied to the Federalist Society — an organization that describes itself as “a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order.”
According to Little, Florida has, for the most part, bucked the national trend of stacking courts with ideologues aligned with the administration that appoints them. He hopes that does not change with DeSantis.
“I'm hopeful that he will try to decide which of these persons would be the best justice in terms of being knowledgeable about the law and impartial about the issues that are being decided and don't have a political agenda,” Little said.
The other South Florida nominees vying for the two at-large seats are:
- Broward Circuit Judge Anuraag Singhal: became the county's first Indian-American judge when he rose to the bench in 2012.
- Fourth District Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Gerber: was appointed by then-Gov. Charlie Crist in 2009.
- Judge Jeffrey T. Kuntz: was appointed by Gov. Scott in 2016 after more than a decade in civil litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
Trending Stories
- 1Navigating the Shifting Sands of E-Discovery and Information Governance in 2025
- 2A Plan for Coordinating State Action on Environmental Protection as the Federal Government Rolls Back National Efforts
- 3Alston & Bird, Eversheds Sutherland Ranked Among Top Firms Globally for M&A Deals in 2024
- 4Sheppard Mullin Expands in Dallas With 6-Lawyer White Collar Team From Bradley
- 5Kirkland, Latham, White & Case Work on $16.4B Energy Deal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250