State-Backed Citizens Property Pitches Insurance Rate Hikes
The proposal, which would take effect in September 2019, will go before the Citizens Board of Governors during a meeting Wednesday.
December 11, 2018 at 12:37 PM
4 minute read
With the state-backed insurer blaming costly water-damage claims in South Florida, residential customers of Citizens Property Insurance Corp. could see an average 8.2 percent rate increase next year, according to a new proposal.
The proposal, which would take effect in September 2019, will go before the Citizens Board of Governors during a meeting Wednesday. If the board signs off, the proposal would need approval from the state Office of Insurance Regulation.
The average 8.2 percent hike would hit “personal lines” policyholders, including owners of single-family homes, owners of condominiums and renters, though increases would vary across the state depending on factors such as location. Commercial policies could see an average 9 percent increase.
In backup material sent Monday to reporters, Citizens blamed water-damage claims and the controversial practice known as “assignment of benefits” for driving up costs and spurring a need for higher rates. The issue involves claims for water damage such as busted pipes in homes, not storm-related water damage.
Assignment of benefits, or AOB as it is known, is perhaps the most-controversial insurance issue in the state Capitol. Under assignment of benefits, homeowners sign over insurance claims to contractors, who then pursue payments from insurance companies.
Citizens, which has about 435,000 policies, and other insurers contend the AOB process is filled with fraud and leads to expensive litigation. But contractors and trial attorneys argue that assignment of benefits helps ensure that damage claims are paid properly.
In the material released Monday, Citizens said “skyrocketing” water-damage claims in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties have come at the same time Citizens has made progress in other financial areas. As an example, Citizens has been able to purchase relatively affordable reinsurance — essentially backup insurance — that has better positioned it financially to deal with major hurricanes.
“While rates for many policy types and areas have been approaching actuarial soundness over the past few years, this recent surge in claims related to non-weather water losses in South Florida has increased Citizens' net claims payments and litigation expense costs,” the material said. “These losses are significant enough to offset previous progress made toward rate adequacy and the decreased cost of reinsurance and other risk transfer products, resulting in the need for a corresponding rate increase.”
But with the AOB issue likely to be debated again during the legislative session that starts in March, Citizens, other insurers and business groups will face opposition.
For instance, the Florida Chamber of Commerce held an insurance “summit” in late November that included calls for making changes in assignment of benefits. But the Restoration Association of Florida, which includes contractors, sent out a statement pointing to widespread consumer complaints against insurers for the way claims are handled.
“The property insurance industry is once again talking about ways to limit and restrict homeowners' rights and abilities by demonizing the assignment of benefits — a common insurance practice that has been around for more than 100 years — and allows homeowners to make repairs to their homes immediately with no out-of-pocket costs and mitigates further damages,” Amanda Prater, a spokeswoman for the association, said in the Nov. 28 statement.
Ordinarily, Citizens would have moved forward with seeking approval of proposed rate increases earlier this year. But in June, it decided to postpone a rate proposal to gauge the impact of a new program aimed at holding down costs of water-damage claims.
The so-called managed repair program, in part, offers incentives for policyholders to use Citizens-approved contractors, with the hope that it will reduce litigation.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
3 minute readHolland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner
3 minute readForum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
Trending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250