State-Backed Citizens Property Pitches Insurance Rate Hikes
The proposal, which would take effect in September 2019, will go before the Citizens Board of Governors during a meeting Wednesday.
December 11, 2018 at 12:37 PM
4 minute read
With the state-backed insurer blaming costly water-damage claims in South Florida, residential customers of Citizens Property Insurance Corp. could see an average 8.2 percent rate increase next year, according to a new proposal.
The proposal, which would take effect in September 2019, will go before the Citizens Board of Governors during a meeting Wednesday. If the board signs off, the proposal would need approval from the state Office of Insurance Regulation.
The average 8.2 percent hike would hit “personal lines” policyholders, including owners of single-family homes, owners of condominiums and renters, though increases would vary across the state depending on factors such as location. Commercial policies could see an average 9 percent increase.
In backup material sent Monday to reporters, Citizens blamed water-damage claims and the controversial practice known as “assignment of benefits” for driving up costs and spurring a need for higher rates. The issue involves claims for water damage such as busted pipes in homes, not storm-related water damage.
Assignment of benefits, or AOB as it is known, is perhaps the most-controversial insurance issue in the state Capitol. Under assignment of benefits, homeowners sign over insurance claims to contractors, who then pursue payments from insurance companies.
Citizens, which has about 435,000 policies, and other insurers contend the AOB process is filled with fraud and leads to expensive litigation. But contractors and trial attorneys argue that assignment of benefits helps ensure that damage claims are paid properly.
In the material released Monday, Citizens said “skyrocketing” water-damage claims in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties have come at the same time Citizens has made progress in other financial areas. As an example, Citizens has been able to purchase relatively affordable reinsurance — essentially backup insurance — that has better positioned it financially to deal with major hurricanes.
“While rates for many policy types and areas have been approaching actuarial soundness over the past few years, this recent surge in claims related to non-weather water losses in South Florida has increased Citizens' net claims payments and litigation expense costs,” the material said. “These losses are significant enough to offset previous progress made toward rate adequacy and the decreased cost of reinsurance and other risk transfer products, resulting in the need for a corresponding rate increase.”
But with the AOB issue likely to be debated again during the legislative session that starts in March, Citizens, other insurers and business groups will face opposition.
For instance, the Florida Chamber of Commerce held an insurance “summit” in late November that included calls for making changes in assignment of benefits. But the Restoration Association of Florida, which includes contractors, sent out a statement pointing to widespread consumer complaints against insurers for the way claims are handled.
“The property insurance industry is once again talking about ways to limit and restrict homeowners' rights and abilities by demonizing the assignment of benefits — a common insurance practice that has been around for more than 100 years — and allows homeowners to make repairs to their homes immediately with no out-of-pocket costs and mitigates further damages,” Amanda Prater, a spokeswoman for the association, said in the Nov. 28 statement.
Ordinarily, Citizens would have moved forward with seeking approval of proposed rate increases earlier this year. But in June, it decided to postpone a rate proposal to gauge the impact of a new program aimed at holding down costs of water-damage claims.
The so-called managed repair program, in part, offers incentives for policyholders to use Citizens-approved contractors, with the hope that it will reduce litigation.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250