Cruise Company Hit With Million-Dollar Suit Over Passenger's Zip Line Death
If Miami-based cruise company Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. hadn't promoted a zip line excursion with a history of emergency brake failures, Igal Tyszman would not have died in a mid-air collision with his wife on their honeymoon, argued Debi Chalik of Chalik & Chalik Law Offices in Plantation.
December 13, 2018 at 03:15 PM
4 minute read
Debi Chalik of Chalik & Chalik Law Offices in Plantation has filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of Israeli tourist Shir Frenkel, who blames Miami-based Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. over a zip line accident that killed her husband on their honeymoon.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, seeks more than $1 million in damages and points the finger at Royal Caribbean for sending guests on a trip that it allegedly knew was “anything but safe.”
Igal Tyszman was 24 when he died in July, after a mid-air collision with his 27-year-old wife of one month, according to the complaint. Frenkel suffered an array of serious injuries, including fractured ribs, spleen and lung damage.
The newlyweds' cruise ship, Allure of the Seas, had docked at the Honduran island of Roatan for the Extreme Caribe Zip Line Tour, the complaint said. The zip line was run by an independent company in Honduras— a detail the plaintiff claimed Royal Caribbean didn't disclose when they booked the trip.
A spokesman for Royal Caribbean declined to comment on the case, and its lawyer, Jonathan Drucker of Trescott & Drucker in Coral Gables, did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
According to Chalik, the plaintiff is suing Royal Caribbean — not the Honduran zip line company — as it found out about the trip at the ship's excursion desk and dealt exclusively with the cruise company throughout booking.
“They asked a lot of questions from the excursion desk about the safety of the zip line, and Royal Caribbean assured them that they partner with and work with only the safest companies out there,” Chalik said.
On the third and longest zip wire ride of the trip, according to Chalik, eye witnesses have said that a guide instructed the couple to lie back in a plank position to avoid losing momentum. On two previous rides, they'd sat upright as they'd been told to in a safety briefing.
“Shir goes first ahead of her husband, through the jungle, and now you don't see her,” Chalik said. “All of a sudden, she completely comes to a halt and starts coming backwards, toward the initial platform that she took off from.”
At the same time, the guide allegedly sent her husband down the zip line.
“He's in that plank position going backwards, so he's not seeing anything,” Chalik said. “He's flying at a very quick rate of speed and literally crashes head-on into his wife.”
According to the lawsuit, the zip line company had a history of accidents involving injuries to Royal Caribbean guests — many allegedly caused by faulty emergency brakes.
“We don't usually have a history of multiple accidents happening,” Chalik said. “Many different Royal Caribbean passengers also suffered injuries as a result of lack of communication between guides or faulty breaking systems.”
Royal Caribbean has yet to file an answer to the complaint.
|Read the full complaint:
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Clarifies Qualifications for Court-Appointed Arbitrators
3 minute read$5.5M Miami Verdict: Meet the Lawyers Behind the Slip-and-Fall Suit
US Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, and End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250