Holiday Horror Stories From Work Parties Past
Yes, it is that time of the year again. Time for the annual holiday party. It is an opportunity for celebration, appreciation and general good cheer … until someone crosses the line.
December 17, 2018 at 10:15 AM
4 minute read
Yes, it is that time of the year again. Time for the annual holiday party. It is an opportunity for celebration, appreciation and general good cheer … until someone crosses the line. As lawyers who specialize in labor and employment law, holiday parties are a favorite topic because there is no shortage of colorful examples of what not to do.
This year, instead of our usual list of “Do's and Don'ts,” we decided that the ghosts of holiday parties past could offer some helpful advice for avoiding legal liability. So pour yourself some eggnog, don your Santa hat, and learn from the Scrooges of actual lawsuits arising from holiday parties gone wrong.
The Designated Driver Who Couldn't Keep His Hands on the Wheel
In 2005, one male supervisor tried to be responsible by personally tending the open bar and serving as a designated driver, see Benjamin v. Anderson, 327 Mont. 173 (2005). He ran into major trouble while driving home an intoxicated female subordinate, who alleged that he initiated sexual contact with her in his car. Even though the company had enough foresight to establish a policy to prevent intoxicated employees from driving, the real-world application of this policy came up short. The employee was eventually awarded $75,000 in emotional distress damages. It's safe to say the ghost of this Christmas past will continue to haunt the employer.
The lesson? Planning sober transportation for your employees is always a good idea, but don't forget that it should also be safe and harassment-free.
The X-Rated Hypnotist
At its 2004 Christmas party, a bank hired a hypnotist as entertainment for the evening, see Clarke v. Bank of Commerce, 506 F.Supp.2d 851 (N.D. Okla. 2007). The hypnotist gave an “X-rated” performance, which included comparing the size of men's penises and convincing a hypnotized woman that she could see a co-worker's penis. Several female employees sued the bank under Title VII, alleging that this performance created a hostile work environment. Although the federal court eventually granted summary judgment in favor of the employer bank, the hypnotist's lasting mental imagery (as well as the bank's embarrassment and legal fees) should serve as a valuable lesson for your future fete. Make sure to thoroughly vet all performers and pre-approve the entertainment planned for your holiday party.
Blackface Is Never OK
Speaking of inappropriate entertainment, in 1998, a multinational company held a Christmas party featuring a Dutch skit in which Santa's helpers were white children with their faces painted black, see Pickens v. Shell Technology Ventures, 118 Fed.Appx. 842 (5th Cir. 2004). During the course of the skit, employees in the audience directed racially insensitive comments toward a black employee. The employee (and others) later brought a Title VII action against the employer, alleging that the employer created and encouraged a hostile work environment. As funny as most holiday party horror stories are, blackface is no laughing matter.
Microphone Mayhem
In 2015, employees at a marketing company were shocked when their male managing partner grabbed the microphone during the holiday party and asked all of the “hoes” to “get on the dance floor and drop it like its hot.” While we might all remember Snoop Dog's 2004 hit single, quoting Snoop at a work function is a risky proposition. As a general rule, we suggest that employers refrain from asking their employees to “twerk,” “get low” or “shake it” at the office holiday party.
It should go without saying that it is never a good idea to pick up a mic while intoxicated (we can only assume the partner was intoxicated at the time). Fortunately for this unlikely emcee, his antics only resulted in a severe reprimand and anti-harassment training.
Special thanks to the ghosts of these holiday parties past for offering up some valuable lessons. Best wishes for a happy (and lawsuit-free) holiday season!
Michael Kantor and Brooke Ehrlich are associates in the Fort Lauderdale office of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute readSEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute readTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
- 2Upstart Insurer That's Wowing Industry Hires AIG Legal Exec to Help Guide Global Expansion
- 3Connecticut Lawyers in Spotlight for Repping FBI Agents
- 4SEC Sued for Failing to Reveal Records Involving Simpson Thacher Attorney
- 5Lawsuit Accuses University of California of Racial Discrimination in Admissions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250