Holiday Horror Stories From Work Parties Past
Yes, it is that time of the year again. Time for the annual holiday party. It is an opportunity for celebration, appreciation and general good cheer … until someone crosses the line.
December 17, 2018 at 10:15 AM
4 minute read
Yes, it is that time of the year again. Time for the annual holiday party. It is an opportunity for celebration, appreciation and general good cheer … until someone crosses the line. As lawyers who specialize in labor and employment law, holiday parties are a favorite topic because there is no shortage of colorful examples of what not to do.
This year, instead of our usual list of “Do's and Don'ts,” we decided that the ghosts of holiday parties past could offer some helpful advice for avoiding legal liability. So pour yourself some eggnog, don your Santa hat, and learn from the Scrooges of actual lawsuits arising from holiday parties gone wrong.
|The Designated Driver Who Couldn't Keep His Hands on the Wheel
In 2005, one male supervisor tried to be responsible by personally tending the open bar and serving as a designated driver, see Benjamin v. Anderson, 327 Mont. 173 (2005). He ran into major trouble while driving home an intoxicated female subordinate, who alleged that he initiated sexual contact with her in his car. Even though the company had enough foresight to establish a policy to prevent intoxicated employees from driving, the real-world application of this policy came up short. The employee was eventually awarded $75,000 in emotional distress damages. It's safe to say the ghost of this Christmas past will continue to haunt the employer.
The lesson? Planning sober transportation for your employees is always a good idea, but don't forget that it should also be safe and harassment-free.
|The X-Rated Hypnotist
At its 2004 Christmas party, a bank hired a hypnotist as entertainment for the evening, see Clarke v. Bank of Commerce, 506 F.Supp.2d 851 (N.D. Okla. 2007). The hypnotist gave an “X-rated” performance, which included comparing the size of men's penises and convincing a hypnotized woman that she could see a co-worker's penis. Several female employees sued the bank under Title VII, alleging that this performance created a hostile work environment. Although the federal court eventually granted summary judgment in favor of the employer bank, the hypnotist's lasting mental imagery (as well as the bank's embarrassment and legal fees) should serve as a valuable lesson for your future fete. Make sure to thoroughly vet all performers and pre-approve the entertainment planned for your holiday party.
|Blackface Is Never OK
Speaking of inappropriate entertainment, in 1998, a multinational company held a Christmas party featuring a Dutch skit in which Santa's helpers were white children with their faces painted black, see Pickens v. Shell Technology Ventures, 118 Fed.Appx. 842 (5th Cir. 2004). During the course of the skit, employees in the audience directed racially insensitive comments toward a black employee. The employee (and others) later brought a Title VII action against the employer, alleging that the employer created and encouraged a hostile work environment. As funny as most holiday party horror stories are, blackface is no laughing matter.
|Microphone Mayhem
In 2015, employees at a marketing company were shocked when their male managing partner grabbed the microphone during the holiday party and asked all of the “hoes” to “get on the dance floor and drop it like its hot.” While we might all remember Snoop Dog's 2004 hit single, quoting Snoop at a work function is a risky proposition. As a general rule, we suggest that employers refrain from asking their employees to “twerk,” “get low” or “shake it” at the office holiday party.
It should go without saying that it is never a good idea to pick up a mic while intoxicated (we can only assume the partner was intoxicated at the time). Fortunately for this unlikely emcee, his antics only resulted in a severe reprimand and anti-harassment training.
Special thanks to the ghosts of these holiday parties past for offering up some valuable lessons. Best wishes for a happy (and lawsuit-free) holiday season!
Michael Kantor and Brooke Ehrlich are associates in the Fort Lauderdale office of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250