Appeals Court Places High-Stakes Marijuana Ruling on Hold
The First District Court of Appeal approved a stay of the ruling but also said consideration of the underlying issues in the case would be “expedited.”
December 20, 2018 at 12:24 PM
4 minute read
Marijuana/photo courtesy of shutterstock
In a closely watched case, an appeals court agreed to put on hold a circuit judge's ruling that said Florida lawmakers and the state Department of Health have violated a 2016 constitutional amendment that broadly legalized medical marijuana.
The First District Court of Appeal approved a stay of the ruling but also said consideration of the underlying issues in the case would be “expedited.” The Florida Department of Health went to the appeals court in October after Leon County Circuit Judge Charles Dodson sided with the Tampa-based firm Florigrown in a battle about how the state is carrying out the constitutional amendment.
Dodson found that a 2017 law was unconstitutional and issued a temporary injunction requiring state health officials to begin registering Florigrown and other medical-marijuana firms to do business. Dodson's ruling targeted parts of the law that placed caps on the number of medical-marijuana licenses and dealt with issues such as the creation of a “vertical integration” system that requires marijuana operators to grow, process and sell medical marijuana, as opposed to businesses being licensed to play different roles in the industry.
The case could open the door to more firms doing business in Florida's fast-growing medical marijuana market. Florigrown, for example, filed the lawsuit after being denied approval by the Department of Health.
In arguing for the stay, Health Department attorneys this month wrote that allowing Dodson's order to “take effect injects confusion and uncertainty into the implementation of the medical marijuana amendment and the registration of MMTCs [medical marijuana treatment centers, as the firms are known] throughout Florida,” the filing said. “Under the existing status quo, the department may only grant an MMTC license to an entity after vetting its qualifications. In contrast, under the injunction order, it is unclear how the department would determine which entities are qualified to operate as an MMTC, or if any registration process would exist at all. This is because the department's authority for establishing such rules … would be gone, nullifying the implementing rules already established by the department.”
But attorneys for Florigrown disputed such arguments.
“Contrary to the department's assertions, Florigrown produced an abundance of evidence establishing the public harm that is occurring because of the Legislature's unconstitutional limits on the registration of medical marijuana treatment centers,” the firm's attorneys said in a brief last week. “It also established that sufficient guidelines already exist to protect the public. The department produced no evidence or testimony to the contrary. All the trial court has done is direct the department to allow the 'registration' of MMTCs. Once an MMTC is registered, it must still meet other requirements before it can actually commence operations.”
The Department of Health's appeal of Dodson's ruling in October triggered an automatic stay. But Florigrown then returned to Dodson and requested that he vacate the stay, which he did in a Dec. 4 order.
Attorneys for the department then went to the appeals court, essentially asking that the stay be reinstated while the appeal of Dodson's October ruling moves forward. The Tallahassee-based appeals court on Tuesday granted that request, saying in a one-page order that the stay “shall remain in effect pending final disposition of the merits of this appeal.”
As is common in such orders, the appeals court did not explain its reasoning. But it also said the appeal will be expedited.
With Florida potentially one of the most-lucrative markets in the country for medical marijuana, disputes about licenses have led to numerous court and administrative fights.
More than 71 percent of voters approved the medical-marijuana constitutional amendment in 2016. In the appeals court filing this month, the Department of Health said 14 medical-marijuana treatment centers had been registered and licensed and that they operated 72 “dispensing locations” across the state.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/aa/ed/a0f3dcb348beab10cf9a1629f79e/florida-international-university-college-of-law-767x633.jpg)
Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
3 minute read![Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/18/1b/6bd668a742d2b7c52a213921ac7b/bucciero-gorwitz-cid-767x633.jpg)
Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
3 minute read![Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/5a/54f1609943889700618e7b8cd244/shaw-wilder-robinson-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
- 2Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
- 3Your Communications Are Not Secure! What Legal Professionals Need to Know
- 4Legal Leaders Need To Create A High-Trust Culture
- 5There's a New Chief Judge in Town: Meet the Top Miami Jurist
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250