Federal Judge Approves $299M Settlement Over Takata Air Bags in Ford Vehicles
U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno approved the settlement despite continued disagreements over attorney fees in the litigation over ineffective air bags manufactured by the Japan-based Takata Corporation.
December 21, 2018 at 03:26 PM
2 minute read
A federal judge has approved a settlement worth hundreds of millions of dollars between the Ford Motor Co. and claimants to a class-action lawsuit over one of the largest auto recalls in history.
Judge Federico Moreno of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida approved the $299.1 million settlement between Ford and class members who had been affected by the international automaker's recall of vehicles with defective air bags. The devices in question were manufactured by Takata Corp., a Japanese company that provided air bags to Ford as well as Toyota, Honda and several major car companies.
The agreement compensates customers for any losses and incurred expenses tied to Ford's recall of vehicles containing Takata-produced air bags, which have been documented as causing severe injuries, and in some cases, death.
The judge also approved the class counsel's motion for attorney fees ”totaling $74,775,000, or 25 percent of the $299,100,000 common fund,” according to the filing.
Read the order:
“We are pleased that the Ford settlement in the Takata MDL has been approved,” said Podhurst Orseck partner Peter Prieto. Prieto, who served as the plaintiff's lead counsel. Orseck said the settlement will save lives “by accelerating the removal of dangerous air bag inflators, while also compensating consumers for their economic losses.”
“We will continue to vigorously prosecute the cases against the remaining automakers to ensure that our class members receive the recovery they deserve,” he added.”
Commenting on the dispute over attorney fees, Prieto said the fees were “entirely consistent with the law in the 11th Circuit” as were all prior fee awards in the multidistrict litigation over Takata's air bags. “In fact, when the entire value of the Ford settlement is considered, the fees are well below the benchmark of 25 percent established by the 11th Circuit,” he said.
The South Florida-based attorneys for Ford and Takata, Stephen J. Krigbaum and Brian Dominguez respectively, did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
- 2FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
- 3Ignore the Decline in US Rule of Law at Your Peril
- 4How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
- 5Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250