Lawsuit Accuses Orlando Utilities Commission of Not Protecting Residents From Coal Plant Contaminants
According to the press release announcing the suit, rates of rare cancers as well as carcinogenic toxins at the Stoneybrook, Avalon Park, Eastwood communities far outpace the national average.
December 21, 2018 at 05:12 PM
4 minute read
A class action lawsuit accuses the Orlando Utilities Commission and several Orlando-based real estate entities of failing to protect more than 30,000 people from the harmful byproducts of a nearby power plant.
The complaint filed Monday names residents of the Stoneybrook, Avalon Park, Eastwood and other Orlando communities as plaintiffs in the case against the utilities commission, developer Lennar Corp., builder U.S. Home Corp., the real estate firm Avalon Park Group and its CEO, Beat Kahli. According to the filing, the defendants are legally liable under Florida Statutes 376.30 through 376.319, which regulate legal action with relation to pollutants and hazardous substances.
Co-lead counsel Theodore Leopold told the Daily Business Review residents reached out to him for consultation in early 2018. Leopold, who is at work on litigation pertaining to lead poisoning in Flint, Michigan, and other pollution-related cases, said his team began investigating almost immediately.
“We've done a tremendous amount of investigation and testing of the soil. After months and months of testing the results say a lot,” the Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll attorney said.
The press release announcing the suit claims the rates of rare, cancerous diseases and carcinogenic toxins in the neighborhoods far outpace national averages.
Read the complaint:
“Evidence shows that the incidence ratio for central nervous system cancer in the area is five to ten times higher than the ratio nationwide,” the release said. “Additionally, the incidence ratio of Ewing's Sarcoma, an extremely rare form of cancer that occurs primarily in children and young adults, is approximately nine times higher than the rate expected for the area.”
Leopold said the facility in question, the Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center, produces “extremely toxic” byproducts as a result of the coal it burns.
“Wind brings these hazardous materials into the neighboring communities,” Leopold explained. He added that the defendants' marketing of the communities as safe, comfortable places to live are at odds with his own findings and the maladies found among residents in the neighborhoods. Copper, lead, mercury and arsenic were among the toxic contaminants detected in the soil according to the complaint.
“There's really no other plausible source of these contaminants,” said co-lead counsel Steve Morrissey.
The Susman Godfrey attorney added it's fortunate Florida has a strict liability statute for pollutants, or what he describes as “the hook” for bringing his client's case to trial.
“The Florida Legislature made it possible like the class in this case to sue anyone who either pollutes or is allowing pollution to remain on a property,” Morrissey said, noting the developers “should be held responsible” for building communities without adequately addressing the possible problems posed by the nearby power plant.
Requests for comment from Lennar Corp. were not returned by press time. A representative for the Avalon Park Group told the Daily Business Review the company does not comment on pending litigation.
In a statement to the Daily Business Review, Tim Trudell, spokesman for the Orlando Utilities Commission, called the Stanton Energy Center's operations “highly regulated by both the state and federal governments.”
“OUC meets or exceeds all permitting requirements, as environmental stewardship is one of the key principles of our organization,” the statement reads. “Due to the pending litigation, we cannot get into any additional detail at this time.”
The utilities commission's website refers to the Stanton Energy Center as a “clean, modern, fuel-diverse, environmentally sound power-generation facility.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250