Lawsuit Accuses Orlando Utilities Commission of Not Protecting Residents From Coal Plant Contaminants
According to the press release announcing the suit, rates of rare cancers as well as carcinogenic toxins at the Stoneybrook, Avalon Park, Eastwood communities far outpace the national average.
December 21, 2018 at 05:12 PM
4 minute read
A class action lawsuit accuses the Orlando Utilities Commission and several Orlando-based real estate entities of failing to protect more than 30,000 people from the harmful byproducts of a nearby power plant.
The complaint filed Monday names residents of the Stoneybrook, Avalon Park, Eastwood and other Orlando communities as plaintiffs in the case against the utilities commission, developer Lennar Corp., builder U.S. Home Corp., the real estate firm Avalon Park Group and its CEO, Beat Kahli. According to the filing, the defendants are legally liable under Florida Statutes 376.30 through 376.319, which regulate legal action with relation to pollutants and hazardous substances.
Co-lead counsel Theodore Leopold told the Daily Business Review residents reached out to him for consultation in early 2018. Leopold, who is at work on litigation pertaining to lead poisoning in Flint, Michigan, and other pollution-related cases, said his team began investigating almost immediately.
“We've done a tremendous amount of investigation and testing of the soil. After months and months of testing the results say a lot,” the Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll attorney said.
The press release announcing the suit claims the rates of rare, cancerous diseases and carcinogenic toxins in the neighborhoods far outpace national averages.
Read the complaint:
“Evidence shows that the incidence ratio for central nervous system cancer in the area is five to ten times higher than the ratio nationwide,” the release said. “Additionally, the incidence ratio of Ewing's Sarcoma, an extremely rare form of cancer that occurs primarily in children and young adults, is approximately nine times higher than the rate expected for the area.”
Leopold said the facility in question, the Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center, produces “extremely toxic” byproducts as a result of the coal it burns.
“Wind brings these hazardous materials into the neighboring communities,” Leopold explained. He added that the defendants' marketing of the communities as safe, comfortable places to live are at odds with his own findings and the maladies found among residents in the neighborhoods. Copper, lead, mercury and arsenic were among the toxic contaminants detected in the soil according to the complaint.
“There's really no other plausible source of these contaminants,” said co-lead counsel Steve Morrissey.
The Susman Godfrey attorney added it's fortunate Florida has a strict liability statute for pollutants, or what he describes as “the hook” for bringing his client's case to trial.
“The Florida Legislature made it possible like the class in this case to sue anyone who either pollutes or is allowing pollution to remain on a property,” Morrissey said, noting the developers “should be held responsible” for building communities without adequately addressing the possible problems posed by the nearby power plant.
Requests for comment from Lennar Corp. were not returned by press time. A representative for the Avalon Park Group told the Daily Business Review the company does not comment on pending litigation.
In a statement to the Daily Business Review, Tim Trudell, spokesman for the Orlando Utilities Commission, called the Stanton Energy Center's operations “highly regulated by both the state and federal governments.”
“OUC meets or exceeds all permitting requirements, as environmental stewardship is one of the key principles of our organization,” the statement reads. “Due to the pending litigation, we cannot get into any additional detail at this time.”
The utilities commission's website refers to the Stanton Energy Center as a “clean, modern, fuel-diverse, environmentally sound power-generation facility.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250