Broward Sheriff's Office Outlines Procedural Reforms After Parkland School Shooting
Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel addressed the changes in a public letter to Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, the chair of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Commission.
December 27, 2018 at 02:32 PM
3 minute read
Broward County Sheriff's Office via Wikimedia Commons
Sheriff Scott Israel has shared several of the changes implemented by the Broward Sheriff's Office in response to the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Feb. 14 that left 17 dead and 17 injured, and resulted in multi-pronged litigation.
In a letter shared publicly on Wednesday, Israel informed Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, the chair of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Commission, of the various alterations made to the South Florida law enforcement agency. Although Israel's email contained documents contrasting the BSO's policies before and after the shooting, he singled out a number of “highlights of the reforms [the BSO] already adopted.” This included the enrollment of all BSO School Resource Officers into a week's worth ”of active shooter, tactics, and concealed carbine carry/qualification training” as well as the opening of investigations into Sgt. Brian Miller and Deputy Edward Eason. The two officers were disciplined in November after body cam footage revealed that after arriving at Stoneman Douglas, Miller and Eason declined to enter the building where shooter Nikolas Cruz was active.
Israel's letter also singled out the amended BSO active-shooter policy. According to the sheriff, the new policy is more consistent with the training provided by the BSO for active-shooter scenarios.
Read Israel's letter: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EyjTutgkqg46cM9cePaIsiAp_FpOnFNW/view?usp=sharing
“Deputies responding to active threat(s) incidents shall attempt to protect the life of innocent persons through immediate tactical intervention to eliminate the threat,” the policy reads. “In such scenarios, the prioritization of activities in order of importance will be: 1. Stop the active assailant(s); 2. Rescue the victims; 3. Provide medical assistance; 4. Arrest suspects and preserve the crime scene.”
Among the attachments included with the letter is a document outlining the law enforcement agency's standard operating procedure for responding to active shooters. The document outlines the respective responsibilities of different response teams and reflects the changes made to the BSO's active shooter policy.
“Be assured, the reforms adopted to date are not the end of this process. Rather, they are a midway point as we continue working towards addressing all of the findings related to our agency and implementing all of the Commission's recommendations,” Israel wrote.
Both Israel and the BSO have received heavy condemnation for their response to Cruz's massacre at his former high school. Criticism has centered heavily on the agency's response time to the shooting, as well as its failure to prevent Cruz from causing harm despite his extensive history of erratic behavior and unsettling remarks.
Related stories:
Broward Sheriff's Office Cleared of Reverse Discrimination Claim
Stoneman Douglas Victims File New Federal Lawsuit Over Mass Shooting in Parkland
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/aa/ed/a0f3dcb348beab10cf9a1629f79e/florida-international-university-college-of-law-767x633.jpg)
Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
3 minute read![Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/18/1b/6bd668a742d2b7c52a213921ac7b/bucciero-gorwitz-cid-767x633.jpg)
Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
3 minute read![Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/5a/54f1609943889700618e7b8cd244/shaw-wilder-robinson-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1New Charges Expected in Sex Trafficking Case Against Broker Brothers
- 2With AI, What Changes Can Midsize Firms Expect?
- 3Saul Ewing Loses Two Partners to Fox Rothschild, Marking Four Fla. Partner Exits in Last 13 Months
- 4Eagles or Chiefs? At These Law Firms, Super Bowl Sunday Gets Complicated
- 5Former NY City Hall Official Tied to Adams Corruption Probe to Plead Guilty
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250