'How Could They Not Show?' Plaintiff to Pay for Opposing Counsel's Long Treks
Sarasota attorney Gregg Horowitz drove about 375 miles to Key West three times, but the other side didn't show up for a foreclosure case.
January 03, 2019 at 12:57 PM
4 minute read
The Third District Court of Appeal has upheld sanctions in a case that saw civil defense attorney Gregg M. Horowitz make a 372-mile drive from his office in Sarasota to a Key West courthouse three times — each time in vain because both the bank plaintiff and its counsel were no-shows.
According to the court opinion, Horowitz arrived for trial in April, July and December 2014, but opposing counsel wasn't there.
“It was very frustrating,” Horowitz said. “You drive down there for more than six hours in the middle of summer, then you walk back to your hotel room, drenched, and call your client to tell them what happened. And he was like, 'What? How could they not show up?' ”
According to Horowitz, two law firms were handling the case — Akerman's South Florida offices and Florida Foreclosure Attorneys in Boca Raton, which has since closed.
Akerman appears to have missed the first trial, though it's not clear from court documents who was handling the case that time. Akerman withdrew from the case in late August, according to Horowitz, leaving co-counsel Florida Foreclosure Attorneys to take over.
The way Horowitz tells it, there may have been confusion as to which firm was handling the trial, as both firms remained on the service list for some time after they'd gone.
“ That was probably their issue, that they didn't know who was on first base and who was covering what,” Horowitz said.
Akerman attorney Jeffrey A. Trinz was listed as co-counsel on an August service list, while William Noriega filed in August for Florida Foreclosure Attorneys, according to a Third DCA appendix filing. Noriega is still listed in Monroe County electronic case files. Neither responded to requests for comment before deadline.
According to then-Akerman foreclosure lawyer Victor Petrescu, it's likely that Akerman would have stepped away from the case early on, giving it to the foreclosure firm. Petrescu left the firm a month before the first trial and doesn't recall being involved in the case.
Read the full court opinion:
|
'Aggravating'
The incident was a first for Horowitz, who has practiced since 1989.
“It was very aggravating, and my clients were very upset,” he said. “They felt that they were being abused.”
Horowitz represented homeowners Peter and Sara Obermeyer in the foreclosure case brought by Bank of New York Mellon in 2008. The case was ultimately dismissed in December 2014 without prejudice, so the defense moved for sanctions, including travel costs. Bank of New York appealed after Monroe Circuit Judge Bonnie J. Helms denied its motion to vacate the sanctions.
Bank of New York's appellate lawyer, Shawn Taylor of the DeLuca Law Group in Fort Lauderdale, came in after the dismissal to litigate attorney fees, but did not respond to requests for comment.
According to Taylor's initial brief filed in July 2018, he missed a hearing on the motion for sanctions due to a legal assistant's scheduling mistake.
“By then that was par for the course, not showing up,” Horowitz said.
Third District Judge Thomas Logue wrote the Dec. 26 opinion on behalf of a panel that included Judges Kevin Emas and Edwin A. Scales III.
Horowitz said he was surprised the court wrote an opinion rather than simply approving the sanctions.
“I appreciate it,” Horowitz said. “They probably wrote the opinion to tell attorneys not to miss trial, that there are consequences.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250