Hospice Doctors Seek Exemption From Drug Database
The requirement for physicians to check the database is aimed, at least in part, at preventing drug abusers from “doctor shopping” to improperly get controlled substances.
January 09, 2019 at 12:59 PM
4 minute read
Less than a year after the Florida Legislature passed a sweeping bill that requires physicians to check a statewide database before ordering opioids for patients, lawmakers are being asked to consider an exemption for doctors who care for dying people.
It's not because the requirement is burdensome for the doctors, said Stephen Leedy, a board-certified hospice and palliative care physician. Instead, it's because checking the prescription-drug database each time controlled substances are ordered for dying people leads to delays, causing the patients to unnecessarily suffer at the end of life, he said.
The requirement for physicians to check the database is aimed, at least in part, at preventing drug abusers from “doctor shopping” to improperly get controlled substances.
“We feel hospice and palliative care providers do not contribute to the diversion problem within the state of Florida, and hospice patients do not either,” Leedy told members of the Senate Health Policy Committee on Monday.
Leedy said Florida had 137,000 hospice patients last year. On average, they were in hospice for three weeks before dying.
“During those three weeks, these patients were not out there 'doctor shopping.' They were not out there looking for opioids in the streets. They were mainly bed-bound and in pain, short of breath, being managed by hospice providers,” he said. “These are not patients that are at risk of going out there doing things that we don't want them to do.”
Moreover, Leedy testified that it's not unusual for a physician to adjust pain medications six or seven times within the first three days of a patient arriving at a hospice. Each time a change is made, the physician has to check the database.
“You can imagine if you do the math and think about it, how ridiculous this process becomes after a while in terms of the number of queries that need to be done,” he said.
The Legislature made a priority last year of trying to take steps to combat addiction to prescription painkillers, which can lead to people abusing street drugs such as heroin and fentanyl.
Lawmakers approved a bill that requires physicians or their staff members to check with a statewide database before prescribing or dispensing drugs. The bill also imposes a three-day limit on prescriptions for treatment of acute pain. Physicians can prescribe up to seven-day supplies of controlled substances if deemed medically necessary.
While the legislation exempted hospice and palliative care patients from the prescription limits, the bill did not exempt the physicians who treat those patients from having to query the database. The Florida Hospice and Palliative Care Association is asking that the Legislature exempt the physicians from having to query the database altogether or require them to check it only when patients are admitted.
Paul Ledford, president of the Florida Hospice and Palliative Care Association, said his association was looking for lawmakers to sponsor such a bill but hasn't found any yet.
But Senate Health Policy Chairwoman Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, told Leedy that she understood his message and that “we'll look into it.”
The Health Policy Committee on Monday received an overview of the 2018 law and the effect it has had on prescribing in Florida.
According to Rebecca Poston, manager of the state's prescription-drug monitoring program, there has been a 3.8 percent reduction in the number of patients receiving controlled substances in Florida. Also, there has been a 4.6 percent decrease in controlled-substance prescriptions dispensed.
Leedy stressed to the committee that physicians support efforts to address opioid abuse but said it doesn't necessarily make sense to require the database queries when patients are dying in hospice programs.
One Florida hospice had queried the prescription-drug monitoring program 180,000 times since the law passed, Leedy said. The queries resulted in finding one patient who had doctor-shopped for painkillers.
“That patient was actively dying at the moment, and the fact they had doctor-shopped previously was not truly relative to the patient's situation,” he said.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner
3 minute readForum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 2GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 3Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 4Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 5Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250