In Sign of the Times, Florida Court Certifies Question Influenced by Mass Shootings
The question concerns exposure to damages if the government waives its sovereign immunity protections in cases of mass injury or deaths.
January 09, 2019 at 06:11 PM
3 minute read
Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal Wednesday certified a question that reflects an unfortunate reality: potential litigation fallout after mass shootings and other tragedies.
The court is weighing public agency exposure to damages if the government waives its sovereign immunity protections in cases of mass injury or deaths. The case hinges on whether the Florida Department of Children and Families and other public agencies failed to protect an 11-year-old boy, Javon Xavier Nelson, killed by his stepfather.
The appellate court had narrowly construed a Florida statute, which governs public agency protection in tort actions, to limit the sovereign immunity waiver to $200,000 in cases where the same negligent act by a state agency results in multiple claims.
But ruling on a motion to certify to the Florida Supreme Court a question with statewide implications, Fourth DCA Judges Martha C. Warner, Melanie G. May and Alan O. Forst noted a spike in claims against government agencies, based on “a number of high-profile mass shootings in the past several years.”
“We acknowledge that a broader reading of the statute could allow a per-injury limitation,” the judicial panel wrote in its unsigned opinion. “Because this issue may continue to arise in the context of mass shootings and other mass injury events, we certify the following question as one of great public importance.”
The question asks:
“When multiple claims of injury or death arise from the same act of negligence committed by a state agency or actor, does the limitation by a waiver of sovereign immunity in Section 768.28(5), Florida Statutes, cap the liability of state agencies at $200,000 for all resulting injuries or deaths, as claims and judgments 'arising out the same incident or occurrence?' ”
The high court has discretion on whether to accept the issue for further review.
Florida has grabbed international headlines after multiple mass shootings, including the 2016 massacre at The Pulse nightclub, where gunman Omar Mateen killed 49 people and injured at least 50 others, and the 2018 attack that left 17 dead at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Less Is More: The Risks of Excessive Data Collection from Mobile Devices
- 2New Reporting Requirements in the Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Sectors
- 3State Court Denies Firm's Attempts to Arbitrate Late Attorney's $10M Life Insurance Dispute
- 4Remote Work and Cybersecurity: Keeping Law Firm Data Safe Beyond the Office
- 5Prisoners Get Education Support, How About Victims?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250