South Florida Lawyers Win $4.1M for Cable Company Fired Over Service Delays
A Miami-Dade County jury sided with PC Services LLC, a cable company that claimed a homeowners association in Lake County should never have broken its agreement and blamed it for service delays.
January 14, 2019 at 02:55 PM
8 minute read
Coral Gables lawyers Joseph A. Miles and Nicholas D. Siegfried landed a $4.1 million verdict for Miami-based company PC Services LLC, which claimed the Cascades of Groveland Homeowners' Association Inc. in Lake County should never have terminated an agreement with the company because it wasn't responsible for a flurry of delays and problems with services.
The 2012 lawsuit arose from years of bad blood between the parties over a deal that turned sour. On July 2007, the homeowner association terminated its contract with PC Services, claiming it had failed to properly do its job. But PC Services argued it had and lost the opportunity to make a profit on its $1.6 million investment.
The defense argued it was right to terminate the agreement because it didn't get what PC Services promised.
Defense lawyers Aristides J. Diaz and Thomas R. Slaten Jr. of Larsen & Associates in Orlando did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Click here to read the full complaint
Making the case was no small feat for the Siegfried, Rivera, Hyman, Lerner, De la Torre, Mars & Sobel lawyers, as it was laced with technical jargon that would likely stump the average juror.
“We just come home, grab our remote and turn on our TV, or get on the internet and it just seems to work like magic,” Miles said. “But in reality there are a lot of moving parts behind the scenes that make that happen.”
PC Services, originally called Groveland Services, helps community associations and developers deliver internet, TV, telephone and alarm services via fiber optic cables.
According to Miles, the new technology was popular back in 2005, when Mario Bustamante, CEO of PC Services' parent company OpticalTel, began working with it.
The homeowner association, keen on incorporating fiber optics into its new residential community, brokered a 10-year agreement with PC Services in September 2005, entrusting the service to provide content to an anticipated 999 homes. To do that, PC Services signed a $1.3 million contract with fiber optic company FPL Fibernet, which supplied the cables and buried them underground.
|Blame game
By early 2006, about 200 residents had moved in. But before long, there was a problem.
PC Services couldn't provide any content to the homes because there was no space to put headend equipment — computer systems and satellite dish antennae, which receive information for services like internet and TV. According to Miles and Siegfried, the clubhouse that was supposed to house the headend equipment didn't exist yet, so PC Services had to find somewhere else to put them.
That meant delays, which in turn caused plenty of complaints from homeowners lacking TV, internet and the rest. A blame game ensued.
“The developer at that time was effectively blaming my client for the delays in providing his services to the owners of the community,” Miles said.
Miles and Siegfried told the jury that developer Levitt & Sons and its homeowner association never disclosed its headend space problem with residents, so they thought PC Services wasn't doing its job.
“Even before we started providing the content, we had homeowners up in arms contacting my client asking, 'What is wrong with you? Why are you delaying the delivery of the services?'” Miles said.
At last, the headend space appeared, the equipment was installed and the services kicked into gear. But then, another problem: There was something wrong with the wiring inside the homes.
“It was not done correctly by the contractor that was hired by the developer,” Miles said. “This in-home wiring was just installed completely haphazardly and incorrectly, and that was giving rise to complaints of homeowners concerning the quality of our services.”
At trial, the pair argued the defendant never hired an expert to come and inspect the wiring, despite complaints from residents.
“Instead, again, they pointed the finger at us and said, 'It's their fault. The reason you're not getting high-quality services is because they're not providing it,'” Miles said. “Nothing could have been further from the truth.”
What's more, Siegfried stressed to the jury that of the 250 homeowners the defense could have brought to the stand, it brought three — amounting to about 1 percent.
“One percent of the community came into court to tell you that there was a problem with my client's services,” Siegfried told the jury.
The jury found that the homeowner association had wronged PC Services, awarding $3.1 million in damages for breach of contract and more than $900,000 for unjust enrichment.
According to Siegfried, most crucial was testimony Alex Gonzalez, a field technician with a background in nuclear physics and no stake in the litigation. Bustamante had hired him to visit homes and troubleshoot technical issues.
“(Gonzalez) testified that when he went into the homes and found the in-home wiring, which was the responsibility of the developer to install, that it was a mess,” Siegfried said. “It was some of the worst wiring he's seen in his 15, 20 years of experience in the industry doing exactly this.”
|The cable company stigma
Right or wrong, cable companies are no strangers to animosity over failing internet, so one major hurdle for Miles and Siegfried was guiding the jury away from any stigma. Testimony from CEO Bustamante went a long way.
“A lot of people have had bad experiences with cable companies, and here we are representing a cable company against homeowners,” Siegfried said. ”(Bustamante) was able to really humanize the experience, as this was a person that invested a lot of money into this community. It wasn't just some big, corporate cable company that couldn't care less about the customer. He was involved in every aspect of this project and I think that jurors really took to that.”
Still, it wasn't easy to argue for damages, according to Miles.
“I was very concerned about asking six people in Miami-Dade County to award millions of dollars for cable, internet, television and alarm services,” Miles said. “But my client expended a lot of money, put himself out there, took a mortgage on his house to fund this project. He was personally involved, and it's still hanging over his head right now.”
When PC Services lost the contract, it couldn't pay the interest it had promised the fiber optic company.
“We still owe FPL Fibernet today,” Miles said. “Our hope and goal is to collect the money that the jury awarded us, so we can satisfy our obligations and also to compensate my client for the profits he would have realized, if they hadn't wrongfully terminated the contract.”
The defense has filed post-trial motions against the verdict, set for a hearing Feb. 7. It has also requested a set-off to reduce the amount awarded, as the developer has since filed for bankruptcy. The plaintiff has asked for a $5.5 million judgment, in light of interest and attorney fees accrued since 2007.
|Read the full verdict form:
Case: PC Services v. The Cascades of Groveland Homeowners' Association
Case No.: 2012-CA-25877
Description: Breach of contract
Filing date: July 3, 2012
Verdict date: Oct. 26, 2018
Judge: Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Miguel de la O
Plaintiffs attorneys: Joseph A. Miles and Nicholas D. Siegfried, Siegfried, Rivera, Hyman, Lerner, De la Torre, Mars & Sobel, Coral Gables
Defense attorney: Aristides J. Diaz and Thomas R. Slaten Jr., Larsen & Associates, Orlando
Verdict amount: $4,118,533.80
More verdicts and settlements:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250