Federal Shutdown: South Florida's Poor, Real Estate Investors Might Feel Impact
The shutdown is thwarting opportunity zone investors from proceeding with deals, and some government-subsidized housing contracts have expired.
January 16, 2019 at 02:33 PM
6 minute read
When it comes to real estate, the longest federal government shutdown could have impacts sparing neither low-income wage earners who rely on subsidies to keep their homes nor well-heeled property investors.
At least three South Florida apartment complexes with a combined 208 households depending on federal subsidies already have expired contracts with the Department of Housing and Urban Development, according to affordable housing advocacy and education group National Low Income Housing Coalition. Contracts at another five complexes expire by month's end.
HUD has brought in some furloughed staffers to work on renewals and will extend subsidies through February, according to department spokesman Brian Sullivan. If the shutdown extends even longer, private landlords and possibly some public housing authorities will be asked to kick in subsidies from their reserves, Sullivan said.
At the same time, investors eager to take advantage of opportunity zones, a mechanism created by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act allowing businesses to defer taxes on capital gains by investing in real estate in distressed areas, are hitting the brakes on their plans, said Stevan Pardo, a Miami attorney representing investors.
The shutdown canceled a Treasury Department hearing in January, which prevented the staff from hammering out opportunity zone regulations, according to Pardo, a partner at Pardo Jackson Gainsburg.
While the department has released preliminary regulations and there's nothing stopping investors from pursuing opportunity zone investments, they prefer not to with the current uncertainties, Pardo said.
He is working with at least five Miami-based real estate investment funds looking at opportunity zones in Florida, New York and Los Angeles. Some have closed on purchases, but none have registered their investments as opportunity zone ventures because they lack the information, Pardo said.
“Many of these investors are risk averse. They want to know the risks of going into these investments,” he said.
|EXPIRING CONTRACTS
HUD has contracts with private landlords throughout the U.S. and kicks in rent subsidies for low- income renters.
Contracts that expired Dec. 21 on Miami-Dade County properties include Cutler Bay Apartments at 10324 SW 212th St. in Cutler Bay and Vista Alegre Apartments at 2235 SW Eighth St. in Miami, according to the Washington-based National Low Income Housing Coalition. St. Charles Place Manor at 2701 Broadway in West Palm Beach also is on the expired list.
Cutler Bay Apartments didn't return a request for comment by deadline. Vista Alegre and St. Charles Place Manor couldn't be reached.
The properties facing expiration by month's end include Douglas Gardens Senior Housing at 705 SW 88th Ave. in Pembroke Pines, Rebecca Towers North at 200 Alton Road in Miami Beach, and Villa Christina at 427 SW Eighth Ave., Villa Margarita at 628 SW Second St. and Palermo Lakes at 5311 NW 7th St. in Miami.
By the end of February, contracts expire for Lock Towns apartments at 2351 NW 135th St. in Opa-locka and Golden Pond Apartments at 1000 NW 155th Lane, Twin Lakes Apartments at 1007 NW 155th Lane and Villa Beatriz at 776 NW Second St. and Allapattah Community Housing II at 1390 NW 24th Ave. in Miami, according to the coalition.
Sullivan couldn't confirm the contract status for these communities but said the coalition data was based on HUD data current last Nov. 28.
Under the circumstances, he said evictions are unlikely.
“It's never been our experience in the past with these shutdowns that anybody has been evicted,” he said.
As for opportunity zones, businesses can sink their capital gains into distressed areas and reduce their taxes on those gains by 10 percent if they keep their investment in real estate for five years, according to Pardo. Separately, investors won't be taxed on appreciation if they keep the property for at least 10 years.
“It is possible that the final regulations may very well have some changes to that. That's the way it stands currently,” he said.
Investors also are waiting for Treasury officials to hammer out specifics on what would qualify as property improvements for an investment to qualify under opportunity zone regulations, he said.
|THE GOOD NEWS
Is there any? Yes.
Commercial real estate and single-family home purchases, at least those not relying on Agriculture Department loans, haven't been affected, brokers said.
For home transactions, there are no hiccups on sales requiring federal flood insurance or receiving Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance, said Mike Pappas, president and CEO at The Keyes Co. in Miami.
“It was a surprise to me,” Pappas said, attributing this to the partial element of the shutdown.
Furloughed government employees also can proceed with buying a home, he added.
“The shutdown isn't material. They have a job. They have their 1099s. They have their W-2s. They've got their pay stubs,” Pappas said. “So they will be able to close accordingly.”
Also, the EB-5 visa program giving green cards to foreigners in exchange for investing at least $500,000 to create at least 10 U.S. jobs had stopped processing new applications, said attorney Ronald Fieldstone in Miami.
“We are in this no-man zone,” said Fieldstone, a partner at Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr.
Still, he added it's not having much of an impact.
“I don't think it's made a big difference in the industry from the point of view of people saying, 'Oh, the program is shut down.' I mean people look at this as a temporary glitch.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250