Former Rosenthal Rasco Partner Feud Leads to Bar Complaint
The Florida Bar filed an ethics complaint against attorney Daniel Kaplan, formerly of Rosenthal Rosenthal Rasco Kaplan, alleging he humiliated and disparaged ex-partner Eduardo Rasco and violated a court order.
January 16, 2019 at 05:46 PM
3 minute read
The Florida Bar filed an ethics complaint against attorney Daniel Kaplan, formerly of Rosenthal Rosenthal Rasco Kaplan, alleging he humiliated and disparaged ex-partner Eduardo Rasco and violated a court order.
The complaint stems from the messy breakup of the firm, which was fraught with lawsuits and countersuits. On Jan. 24, 2017, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jorge Cueto granted Rasco a temporary injunction ordering Kaplan to refrain from making defamatory remarks against Rasco after Kaplan sent multiple emails to clients accusing Rasco of “criminal, immoral and scandalous conduct,” according to court records.
On Aug. 18, 2017, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas fined Kaplan $10,000 and granted an emergency motion for contempt for violating the court order 30 days after the January injunction was filed.
The bar complaint filed Monday also alleges misconduct under Florida Bar Rule 4-8.4 when Kaplan referred to opposing counsel Karen Haas as “that thing over there” in an unrelated case.
Miami-Dade Circuit Chief Judge Bertila Soto has been appointed as referee by the Florida Supreme Court. Soto will submit findings of fact and recommendations to the Supreme Court, which will make the final ruling on any punishment.
Though Kaplan filed the first lawsuit in 2017, seeking judicial dissolution and $15,000 in damages, a report filed later that year by special magistrate Markenzy Lapointe found Kaplan owed the firm $234,355 and fellow partner Kerry Rosenthal owed $7,784.
According to court documents, Kaplan violated the January 2017 injunction when he sent several emails to Rasco calling him a “liar and a thief,” “master gamesman,” “ungrateful liar” and “piece of trash,” among other remarks. The complaint and August court filing also say that Kaplan threatened to drag a client into the lawsuit if Rasco did not drop the defamation lawsuit against Kaplan, telling the client he would lose his job.
Since the breakup, Kaplan has formed Kaplan Loebl, a four-attorney family law firm. Kaplan referred inquiries by the Daily Business Review to his attorney, Richard Baron, who said, “I have no comment at these early stages.”
Rasco, who has formed the firm Rosenthal Rosenthal Rasco with his old partners, declined to comment, saying he will be serving as a witness.
“In over 30 years of working in the law, I had never reported an attorney to the bar,” he said. “Judge Cueto ordered me to report Kaplan to the bar.”
Read the Complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules
- 2Compliance with EU AI Act Lags Behind As First Provisions Take Effect
- 3NJ's Pardons and Commutations A Model for the Federal System
- 4As Political Retribution Intensifies, Look to Navalny's Lawyers
- 5Family Law Practitioners Weigh In on Court System's New Joint Divorce Program
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250