Brock & Scott Sued in Federal Court in Florida Over its Debt Collection Practices
A lawsuit filed Tuesday in the Southern District of Florida alleges Winston-Salem, North Carolina-based firm Brock & Scott broke state and federal law in its pursuit of a Fort Lauderdale woman's debt.
January 17, 2019 at 03:30 PM
3 minute read
A debt collection law firm with offices around the country has found itself at the center of a federal lawsuit in South Florida.
Brock & Scott was named as the defendant in a lawsuit filed Tuesday in the Southern District of Florida. The firm, which is based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, has offices in Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia.
But a new lawsuit accuses the firm of violating the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Florida's Consumer Collection Practices Act in its work against Fort Lauderdale resident Virginia Frick.
Read the complaint:
As detailed by the plaintiffs attorney, North Palm Beach lawyer John Skrandel, Brock & Scott and his client had clashed before this suit.
“We had an underlying collection case they handled and was settled for their client SunTrust,” Skrandel said. “We reached an agreement where [Frick] was going to make payments … and she made payments.”
The attorney explained that the current trouble began when his client paid for several months at once. According to Skrandel, he negotiated specifically for Frick to be able to make advance payments in a provision of the original settlement.
“They rejected it,” he said. “I tried contacting them to let them know they screwed up. They sent a nasty letter saying the entire agreement was void.”
Skrandel said Frick was asked to pay double the amount of her original debt with a new total of $47,694.47. “My client is elderly, has health issues … and it's weighing heavily on her,” he said.
Skrandel noted he has yet to receive a response from any attorneys at Brock & Scott. The lawyer insisted the firm had no grounds to reject his client's payment in light of her pre-existing settlement and protections under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act . “Attorneys need to be very careful. They have responsibilities, and someone dropped the ball here somewhere,” Skrandel said. “It seems they never make mistakes that favor someone else. They always make mistakes that favor themselves.”
A consumer contact manager with Brock & Scott told the DBR he was not authorized to comment on the litigation. Attempts to reach founding partners Thomas Brock and Gregory Scott were not answered by press time.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250