Brock & Scott Sued in Federal Court in Florida Over its Debt Collection Practices
A lawsuit filed Tuesday in the Southern District of Florida alleges Winston-Salem, North Carolina-based firm Brock & Scott broke state and federal law in its pursuit of a Fort Lauderdale woman's debt.
January 17, 2019 at 03:30 PM
3 minute read
A debt collection law firm with offices around the country has found itself at the center of a federal lawsuit in South Florida.
Brock & Scott was named as the defendant in a lawsuit filed Tuesday in the Southern District of Florida. The firm, which is based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, has offices in Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia.
But a new lawsuit accuses the firm of violating the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Florida's Consumer Collection Practices Act in its work against Fort Lauderdale resident Virginia Frick.
Read the complaint:
As detailed by the plaintiffs attorney, North Palm Beach lawyer John Skrandel, Brock & Scott and his client had clashed before this suit.
“We had an underlying collection case they handled and was settled for their client SunTrust,” Skrandel said. “We reached an agreement where [Frick] was going to make payments … and she made payments.”
The attorney explained that the current trouble began when his client paid for several months at once. According to Skrandel, he negotiated specifically for Frick to be able to make advance payments in a provision of the original settlement.
“They rejected it,” he said. “I tried contacting them to let them know they screwed up. They sent a nasty letter saying the entire agreement was void.”
Skrandel said Frick was asked to pay double the amount of her original debt with a new total of $47,694.47. “My client is elderly, has health issues … and it's weighing heavily on her,” he said.
Skrandel noted he has yet to receive a response from any attorneys at Brock & Scott. The lawyer insisted the firm had no grounds to reject his client's payment in light of her pre-existing settlement and protections under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act . “Attorneys need to be very careful. They have responsibilities, and someone dropped the ball here somewhere,” Skrandel said. “It seems they never make mistakes that favor someone else. They always make mistakes that favor themselves.”
A consumer contact manager with Brock & Scott told the DBR he was not authorized to comment on the litigation. Attempts to reach founding partners Thomas Brock and Gregory Scott were not answered by press time.
Related stories:
Law Firm Accused of 'Sewer Service' — Covertly Obtaining Default Judgments Against Defendants
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250