Construction Defect Cases On the Rise: Who's to Blame and What's Next?
The construction industry may have been booming, but data now suggests that this marked boost has resulted in an accumulation of noted substandard work.
January 22, 2019 at 09:08 AM
3 minute read
The construction industry may have been booming, but data now suggests that this marked boost has resulted in an accumulation of noted substandard work. According to statistics pulled from Courthouse News, the sheer number of construction defect claims in Florida has increased exponentially in the last decade. In 2008, there were only 31 construction defect complaints filed, but that number dramatically increased in 2017 to close to 1,000. These startling statistics indicate an extreme level of exposure for contractors, subcontractors and other big players in the industry.
The tight labor market may partially be to blame for these unsettling findings. In Florida, construction employment rose by 6.2 percent in 2017, making it one of the most rapidly expanding labor segments in the state. This may be good news for the average American worker: more jobs are available to those who have endured long periods of unemployment and wages are being driven higher.
However, the booming economy and increased development activate an underlying problem within the industry—an overpriced labor pool that doesn't have the requisite training and skills to perform the required work to properly complete a project. In fact, many high-ranking members in the industry have cited costs and availability of labor as one of their top concerns in the construction market. Add to that the rising costs of safety compliance, stricter timelines with punitive measures for missed deadlines and the ever-present danger of late or delinquent compensation on the part of the hiring client, and contractors and construction firms are hard-pressed to consider any and all solutions for keeping their businesses afloat.
Did these players bite off more than they can chew? As labor costs continue to rise, employers are forced to balance cost, quantity and quality of workers. Naturally, firms resort to engaging a greater portion of cheaper, unskilled labor compared to that of more expensive, skilled labor. On top of that, many construction firms do not take time or allocate resources to properly train and educate their employees. This may simply be a result of a business decision, or it could be indicative of an inherent skill shortage in the industry. Either way, this leaves property owners with an increased susceptibility to defects. Likewise, it leaves firms, contractors, and the like significantly exposed to potential liability in construction defect claims, as they continue to rely on an unskilled labor force that lacks proper training to complete complex construction projects.
The construction industry should be concerned about their continually expanding exposure. With all the questions surrounding the future of the construction industry one thing is for sure: while the construction market may have “boomed,” certain companies may go bust due to the corners that they cut.
Josh Migdal is partner with Florida boutique litigation law firm Mark Migdal & Hayden. As a trusted counselor and commercial litigator, Migdal represents clients such as banks, public and private companies, real estate developers, investors and owners, tech entrepreneurs, gaming operators, family offices, and hotels.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250