Construction Defect Cases On the Rise: Who's to Blame and What's Next?
The construction industry may have been booming, but data now suggests that this marked boost has resulted in an accumulation of noted substandard work.
January 22, 2019 at 09:08 AM
3 minute read
The construction industry may have been booming, but data now suggests that this marked boost has resulted in an accumulation of noted substandard work. According to statistics pulled from Courthouse News, the sheer number of construction defect claims in Florida has increased exponentially in the last decade. In 2008, there were only 31 construction defect complaints filed, but that number dramatically increased in 2017 to close to 1,000. These startling statistics indicate an extreme level of exposure for contractors, subcontractors and other big players in the industry.
The tight labor market may partially be to blame for these unsettling findings. In Florida, construction employment rose by 6.2 percent in 2017, making it one of the most rapidly expanding labor segments in the state. This may be good news for the average American worker: more jobs are available to those who have endured long periods of unemployment and wages are being driven higher.
However, the booming economy and increased development activate an underlying problem within the industry—an overpriced labor pool that doesn't have the requisite training and skills to perform the required work to properly complete a project. In fact, many high-ranking members in the industry have cited costs and availability of labor as one of their top concerns in the construction market. Add to that the rising costs of safety compliance, stricter timelines with punitive measures for missed deadlines and the ever-present danger of late or delinquent compensation on the part of the hiring client, and contractors and construction firms are hard-pressed to consider any and all solutions for keeping their businesses afloat.
Did these players bite off more than they can chew? As labor costs continue to rise, employers are forced to balance cost, quantity and quality of workers. Naturally, firms resort to engaging a greater portion of cheaper, unskilled labor compared to that of more expensive, skilled labor. On top of that, many construction firms do not take time or allocate resources to properly train and educate their employees. This may simply be a result of a business decision, or it could be indicative of an inherent skill shortage in the industry. Either way, this leaves property owners with an increased susceptibility to defects. Likewise, it leaves firms, contractors, and the like significantly exposed to potential liability in construction defect claims, as they continue to rely on an unskilled labor force that lacks proper training to complete complex construction projects.
The construction industry should be concerned about their continually expanding exposure. With all the questions surrounding the future of the construction industry one thing is for sure: while the construction market may have “boomed,” certain companies may go bust due to the corners that they cut.
Josh Migdal is partner with Florida boutique litigation law firm Mark Migdal & Hayden. As a trusted counselor and commercial litigator, Migdal represents clients such as banks, public and private companies, real estate developers, investors and owners, tech entrepreneurs, gaming operators, family offices, and hotels.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250