GC Carlos Muñiz Rises to Florida Supreme Court, as Some Cite Lack of Judicial Experience
Justice Muñiz is presently serving as general counsel for the U.S. Department of Education. The newly named justice notably worked under Gov. Jeb Bush as deputy general counsel and defended Florida State University in the Jameis Winston rape case.
January 22, 2019 at 02:44 PM
4 minute read
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Tuesday named Carlos Muñiz as his newest appointment to the Florida Supreme Court.
Speaking in front of the Governor's Mansion in Tallahassee, DeSantis described Muñiz as ”among the highest qualified individuals to serve our state as a jurist on the Florida Supreme Court.”
“Justice Muñiz is regarded by his peers within the legal community as one of the most brilliant legal minds to serve our state,” DeSantis said. “His record in public service spans across two decades and all three branches of government, where he's demonstrated a deep appreciation for the separation of powers throughout these institutions and a clear regard for the proper role of the courts.”
But critics were quick to point to the new justice's lack of judicial experience.
|
Click here to read Muñiz's Department of Education bio.
Muñiz is general counsel for the U.S. Department of Education, where he leads the Office of the General Counsel, and provides legal and policy advice to the secretary of education and other senior officials, according to his public profile. The Yale Law School graduate served as deputy general counsel for former Gov. Jeb Bush, a role that saw him work under then-general counsel Charles Canady, who has since risen to chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court. Muñiz later acted as general counsel for Marco Rubio during the U.S. senator's tenure as speaker of the Florida House of Representatives.
|
Related story: Gov. Ron DeSantis Appoints Miami Judge Robert Luck to Florida Supreme Court
Muñiz served as deputy attorney general and chief of staff to former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi between 2011 and 2014. He also defended Florida State University in a lawsuit alleging the school neglected to investigate a sexual assault allegation against star Seminoles quarterback Jameis Winston.
Muñiz thanked DeSantis as well as President Donald Trump in his remarks during the announcement. He also committed “to excellence, to humility and to liberty” while serving on the bench.
Reactions to Muñiz's appointment have varied.
Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody praised DeSantis' pick, calling the new jurist “a great addition to the Florida Supreme Court.”
“Prior to taking office, I and my staff met and talked with Justice Muniz multiple times,” Moody said. “I was struck by his intellect, his integrity and his insight into government. My office looks forward to appearing in front of the full Florida Supreme Court, including Justice Muniz.”
But Florida Democratic Party Chair Terrie Rizzo criticized Muñiz's new role within Florida's highest court.
“From his appointment it's clear that Ron DeSantis has no respect for the rule of the law and is seeking to stack the courts with his political allies,” Rizzo said. ”Carlos Muñiz has no judicial experience, [and] instead comes with a long political resume that includes working for Betsy DeVos' Department of Education and Pam Bondi's Attorney General Office.”
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Fred Karlinsky — a member of the Supreme Court Judicial Nominating Commission — called Muñiz's experience a “potential positive” for the bench.
“His background is one that's very diverse,” Karlinsky said. “He's known to a number of people and I believe he will excel as a judge. … He's always served in every role with distinction, and I'm sure he'll do the same as a justice on the Supreme Court.”
Karlinsky referred to Muñiz's elevation to the Florida Supreme Court as “another very thoughtful appointment” by Gov. DeSantis, who's also elevated Third District Court of Appeal Judges Robert Luck and Barbara Lagoa.
He said, “Anyone in the legal community who knows the three new justices knows that they are very qualified, will excel in their roles, will not legislate from the bench, and uphold the law and Constitution of the state of Florida.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute read'Horror of Horrors': Florida Judges Spar Over En Banc Review in Binance Ruling
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
- 4‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
- 5Cravath Matches 'Special' and Year-End Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250